Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 710

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XVIII. Constraints and stability in Hartree–Fock theory

Seeger, Rolf, Pople, John A.·1977·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Constraints that may be applied to the spin orbitals used in Hartree–Fock theory are classified and discussed. Once a constrained stationary wavefunction has been obtained by a self-consistent procedure, it may be tested for stability both internally (with constraints remaining) and externally (with some constraints removed). Methods for carrying out these tests are presented. In addition, a general technique is described for further energy minimization following detection of an instability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.434318

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 710

Metadata

Authors
Seeger, R., & Pople, J. A.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1977-04-01
Volume
66
Issue
7
Pages
3045-3050
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2062745494
Cited by
710
References
4
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XVIII. Constraints and stability in Hartree–Fock theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.434318
The paper
Seeger, R., & Pople, J. A. (1977). Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XVIII. Constraints and stability in Hartree–Fock theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.434318

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.