Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vibrationally adiabatic models for reactive tunneling

Skodje, Rex T., Truhlar, Donald G., Garrett, Bruce C.·1982·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

The approximation of vibrational adiabaticity in curvilinear natural collision coordinates is investigated for tunneling in three-atom collinear reactions. A validity criterion is derived which limits the adiabatic approximation to systems with small reaction-path curvature. A general formalism is developed for systems which satisfy this criterion. A one-dimensional Schrödinger equation is proposed which is sufficiently flexible so as to be adaptable to many different models of tunneling. We present three new methods for including reaction-path curvature effects on multidimensional tunneling in reactive systems: a method based on a quantum mechanical vibrational average (VA) over degrees of freedom transverse to the minimum-energy path; a method (called DA for dynamical-path vibrational- average) that includes internal centrifugal effects in the description of the transverse vibrational motion (in this method the vibrational average is approximated as a quantal vibrational average about the dynamical path along which the Born–Oppenheimer force cancels the internal centrifugal force); and a semiclassical optical potential (SOP) method based on the Feshbach formalism translated into an adiabatic representation with reaction-path curvature providing the coupling mechanism between the explicit and implicit spaces. These models are compared, both formally and numerically, to each other and to four other methods that have been proposed previously, including the small-curvature (SC) approximation that we have proposed in a recent communication. The VA and SOP methods are shown to provide generalizations of phase average (PA) and second-order (SO) methods proposed earlier by Miller and co-workers. The difference is that vibrations are treated quantum mechanically in the VA and SOP methods but classically and harmonically in the PA and SO methods; the quantum mechanical methods have the advantage that anharmonicity can be included more straightforwardly. The DA, SO, and SOP methods, although they include internal centrifugal effects more fully than the VA and PA methods, do not offer significant improvement in accuracy. The numerical results clearly support the physical interpretation of the collapse of the vibrational wave function about a least-action path. The most successful methods are the Marcus–Coltrin path (MCP) and SC approximations. These methods, especially the SC approximation because it is more general, are recommended for future applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.443866

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Skodje, R. T., Truhlar, D. G., & Garrett, B. C.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1982-12-15
Volume
77
Issue
12
Pages
5955-5976
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2036618001
Cited by
271
References
17
FWCI
10.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vibrationally adiabatic models for reactive tunneling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.443866
The paper
Skodje, R. T., Truhlar, D. G., & Garrett, B. C. (1982). Vibrationally adiabatic models for reactive tunneling. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.443866

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.