The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new analysis of charge transfer and polarization for ligand–metal bonding: Model studies of Al4CO and Al4NH3
Abstract
A new analysis of the intra-unit charge polarization and inter-unit donation for the interaction of ligands with metals is presented. The analysis is based on the calculation of SCF wave functions with constraints imposed on the variational space used for the molecular orbitals of metal–ligand clusters. With this approach, various kinds of ligand and metal charge rearrangement can be studied separately and their energetic contribution to the bonding can be determined. For the first time, this contribution for metal to ligand and ligand to metal donation is established. The constrained space orbital variation CSOV approach also clearly shows the similarities and the differences between the bonding of CO and NH3. The results are obtained for Al4CO and Al4NH3 clusters chosen to simulate the adsorption of the ligands at an on-top site of the Al(111) surface. However, the features found for these model systems have significance for the analysis of ligand–metal bonding in general. The analysis gives new estimates for the importance of charge donations which are different from those commonly believed. It also shows new important features of the interaction. One unexpected feature of the metal–NH3 interaction is that the electrostatic attraction of the effective dipole moments of the metal and ligand units makes an important contribution to the bond. Inter-unit donation of charge does not seem to be important for this system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-0940 · Cited by 14,314
Cited by
Glendening, E. D., & Streitwieser, A. (1994) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.466432 · Cited by 466
The interpretation of XPS spectra: Insights into materials properties
Bagus, P. S., Ilton, E. S., & Nelin, C. J. (2013) · Surface Science Reports · doi:10.1016/j.surfrep.2013.03.001 · Cited by 448
Self-citationStability and Effects of Subsurface Oxygen in Oxide-Derived Cu Catalyst for CO 2 Reduction
Liu, C., Lourenço, M. P., Hedström, S., Cavalca, F., Diaz-Morales, O., Duarte, H. A., Nilsson, A., & Pettersson, L. G. M. (2017) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08269 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagus, P. S., Hermann, K., & Bauschlicher, C. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1984-05-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4378-4386
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2084472180
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new analysis of charge transfer and polarization for ligand–metal bonding: Model studies of Al4CO and Al4NH3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.447215
- The paper
- Bagus, P. S., Hermann, K., & Bauschlicher, C. W. (1984). A new analysis of charge transfer and polarization for ligand–metal bonding: Model studies of Al4CO and Al4NH3. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.447215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.