Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 880

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the evaluation of analytic energy derivatives for correlated wave functions

Handy, Nicholas C., Schaefer, Henry F.·1984·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

It is shown that to obtain the (2n)th and (2n+1)th energy gradients, it is only necessary to solve equations of the difficulty of the nth order coupled perturbed equations for the orbital and configuration interaction (CI) parameters. For example, to find analytic second and third energy derivatives for CI wave functions, it is only necessary to solve the first order coupled perturbed equations and some related equations, for the effects of orbital rotations. Similar results apply for gradients of energies derived using perturbation theory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.447489

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 880

Metadata

Authors
Handy, N. C., & Schaefer, H. F.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1984-12-01
Volume
81
Issue
11
Pages
5031-5033
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2022495401
Cited by
880
References
0
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the evaluation of analytic energy derivatives for correlated wave functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.447489
The paper
Handy, N. C., & Schaefer, H. F. (1984). On the evaluation of analytic energy derivatives for correlated wave functions. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.447489

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.