Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 409

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Relationship between band gap and bond length alternation in organic conjugated polymers

Brédas, J. L.·1985·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

We describe calculations of the evolution of the band gap as a function of geometry in conjugated polymers based on aromatic rings: polyparaphenylene, polypyrrole, polythiophene. Our results demonstrate that the gap decreases as a function of increasing quinoid character of the backbone and is thus not minimal in the case of zero bond length alternation, in contrast to the situation found in polyacetylene-like compounds. We stress the consequences of these results for the understanding of the effects of doping and for the design of new organic polymers with small gaps.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.448868

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 409

Metadata

Authors
Brédas, J. L.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1985-04-15
Volume
82
Issue
8
Pages
3808-3811
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2010007250
Cited by
409
References
0
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship between band gap and bond length alternation in organic conjugated polymers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.448868
The paper
Brédas, J. L. (1985). Relationship between band gap and bond length alternation in organic conjugated polymers. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.448868

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.