Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Extraction of kinetic parameters in temperature programmed desorption: A comparison of methods

Miller, J. B., Siddiqui, H. R., Gates, S. M., Russell, J. N., Yates, J. T., Tully, J. C., Cardillo, M. J.·1987·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

An investigation of the temperature programmed desorption (TPD) of CO and D2 from Ni(111) has been carried out. It has been shown that a differential method for the extraction of the kinetic parameters, threshold temperature programmed desorption (TTPD), can be applied with accuracy near the limit of zero coverage. In this limit, agreement is found between integral and differential methods for kinetic parameter evaluation. The factors which limit the applicability of TTPD are explored and a method to verify its proper application is presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.453409

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Miller, J. B., Siddiqui, H. R., Gates, S. M., Russell, J. N., Yates, J. T., Tully, J. C., & Cardillo, M. J.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1987-12-01
Volume
87
Issue
11
Pages
6725-6732
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2024651849
Cited by
247
References
0
FWCI
9.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extraction of kinetic parameters in temperature programmed desorption: A comparison of methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.453409
The paper
Miller, J. B., Siddiqui, H. R., Gates, S. M., Russell, J. N., Yates, J. T., Tully, J. C., & Cardillo, M. J. (1987). Extraction of kinetic parameters in temperature programmed desorption: A comparison of methods. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.453409

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.