The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A complete basis set model chemistry. I. The total energies of closed-shell atoms and hydrides of the first-row elements
Abstract
The major source of errror in most ab initio calculations of molecular energies is the truncation of the one-electron basis set. A complete basis set model chemistry is defined to include corrections for basis set truncation errors. This model uses double zeta plus polarization level atomic pair natural orbital basis sets to calculate molecular self-consistent-field (SCF) energies and correlation energies. The small corrections to give the complete basis set SCF energies are then estimated using the l−6 asymptotic convergence of the multicenter angular momentum expansion. The calculated correlation energies of the atoms He, Be, and Ne, and of the hydrides LiH, BH3, CH4, NH3, H2O, and HF, using the double zeta plus polarization basis sets vary from 83.0% to 91.2% of the experimental correlation energies. However, extrapolation of each of the pair energies and pair-coupling terms to the complete basis set values using the asymptotic convergence of pair natural orbital expansions retrieves from 99.5±0.7% to 101.1±0.6% of the experimental correlation energies for these atoms and molecules. With the exception of ammonia which gave 101.1%, the calculated correlation energies agree with the experimental values to within the error limits of the experiments for all these atoms and molecules with more than four electrons. The total extrapolated energies (ESCF+ECorrelation) are then in agreement with experiment to within ±0.0014 hartree (root mean square deviation) and represent the most accurate total energy calculations yet reported for the molecules. The largest discrepancies with experiment occur for methane, where we obtain ETotal =−40.5112 hartree compared to EExpt =−40.514±0.002 hartree, and ammonia, where we obtain ETotal =−56.5659 hartree compared to EExpt =−56.563±0.002 hartree.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cossi, M., Rega, N., Scalmani, G., & Barone, V. (2003) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.10189 · Cited by 8,056
Computational electrochemistry: prediction of liquid-phase reduction potentials
Marenich, A. V., Ho, J., Coote, M. L., Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c4cp01572j · Cited by 508
Photoexcitation of flavoenzymes enables a stereoselective radical cyclization
Biegasiewicz, K. F., Cooper, S. J., Gao, X., Oblinsky, D. G., Kim, J. H., Garfinkle, S. E., Joyce, L. A., Sandoval, B. A., Scholes, G. D., & Hyster, T. K. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw1143 · Cited by 445
Daoud, D., Douadi, T., Hamani, H., Chafaa, S., & Al-Noaimi, M. (2015) · Corrosion Science · doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2015.01.025 · Cited by 438
Chemically circular, mechanically tough, and melt-processable polyhydroxyalkanoates
Zhou, L., Zhang, Z., Shi, C., Scoti, M., Barange, D. K., Gowda, R. R., & Chen, E. Y.-X. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg4520 · Cited by 220
Metadata
- Authors
- Petersson, G. A., Bennett, A., Tensfeldt, T. G., Al-Laham, M. A., Shirley, W. A., & Mantzaris, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1988-08-15
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2193-2218
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1981745234
- Cited by
- 3,120
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A complete basis set model chemistry. I. The total energies of closed-shell atoms and hydrides of the first-row elements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.455064
- The paper
- Petersson, G. A., Bennett, A., Tensfeldt, T. G., Al-Laham, M. A., Shirley, W. A., & Mantzaris, J. (1988). A complete basis set model chemistry. I. The total energies of closed-shell atoms and hydrides of the first-row elements. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.455064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.