The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An improved computational constitutive model for brittle materials
Abstract
An improved computational constitutive model for brittle materials is presented. It is applicable for brittle materials subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high pressures, and is well‐suited for computations in both Lagrangian and Eulerian codes. The equivalent strength is dependent on the intact strength, fractured strength, strain rate, pressure, and damage. The pressure includes the effect of bulking, which is introduced through the transfer of internal energy from decreased shear and deviator stresses to potential internal energy associated with increased hydrostatic pressure. Examples are presented to illustrate the model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Johnson, G. R., & Cook, W. H. (1985) · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · doi:10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 · Cited by 6,333
Self-citation
Cited by
Modeling damage and deformation in impact simulations
Collins, G. S., Melosh, H. J., & Ivanov, B. A. (2004) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00337.x · Cited by 452
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, G. R., & Holmquist, T. J.
- Venue
- AIP Conference Proceedings
- Publisher
- AIP
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 309
- Pages
- 981-984
- ISSN
- 0094-243X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2590511068
- Cited by
- 771
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An improved computational constitutive model for brittle materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.46199
- The paper
- Johnson, G. R., & Holmquist, T. J. (1994). An improved computational constitutive model for brittle materials. AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.46199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
