The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the choice of orbitals for symmetry breaking problems with application to NO3
Abstract
The suitability of using approximate Brueckner determinants in coupled-cluster (CC) studies of orbital symmetry-breaking problems is explored. At least for the cases considered here [NO3(2A′2), N2(2Σg+) and NO2(2B2)], the Brueckner reference function, which by definition does not mix with single excitations in the CC wave function, preserves symmetry exactly. Furthermore, these solutions do not appear to be sensitive to the initial guess, as the same symmetric solutions are obtained starting with either symmetry-broken or symmetry-constrained initial guesses. The same behavior is not observed for Brueckner determinants obtained from configuration interaction calculations, where symmetry-broken solutions are found. An evaluation of the merits of basing CC calculations on Brueckner determinants [B–CC] and quasirestricted Hartree–Fock [QRHF] reference functions (which also can be chosen to preserve symmetry exactly) is presented. Calculations carried out on the NO3 radical predict a C2v equilibrium geometry at both the B–CC and QRHF–CC levels when triple excitations are not included. However, all methods which include an approximate treatment of triple excitation effects predict an extremely flat potential surface which slightly favors the symmetric [D3h] form of the molecule.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry
Bartlett, R. J., & Musiał, M. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.291 · Cited by 3,343
Self-citationParrish, R. M., Burns, L. A., Smith, D. G. A., Simmonett, A. C., DePrince, A. E., Hohenstein, E. G., Bozkaya, U., Sokolov, A. Y., Di Remigio, R., Richard, R. M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00174 · Cited by 1,249
Stanton, J. F., & Gauss, J. (1994) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.468022 · Cited by 608
Self-citationSimulating X-ray Spectroscopies and Calculating Core-Excited States of Molecules
Norman, P., & Dreuw, A. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00156 · Cited by 312
Unrestricted Coupled Cluster and Brueckner Doubles Variations of W1 Theory
Barnes, E. C., Petersson, G. A., Montgomery, J. A., Frisch, M. J., & Martin, J. M. L. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct900260g · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Stanton, J. F., Gauss, J., & Bartlett, R. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1992-10-15
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5554-5559
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1998126902
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the choice of orbitals for symmetry breaking problems with application to NO3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.463762
- The paper
- Stanton, J. F., Gauss, J., & Bartlett, R. J. (1992). On the choice of orbitals for symmetry breaking problems with application to NO3. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.463762
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.