The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison of the structure and dynamics of liquid water at hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces—a molecular dynamics simulation study
Abstract
The structure and dynamics of liquid water at the interface with three solid surfaces has been investigated via molecular dynamics simulation. The three surfaces include a flat hydrophobic surface, an atomically rough hydrophobic surface, and a contrasting, hydrophilic, fully hydroxylated silica surface. The results of analysis show that, as expected, the solvent near each of the two hydrophobic surfaces behaves essentially equivalently, with loss of hydrogen bonding at the interface. For the hydroxylated surface, surface–solvent hydrogen bonding is stronger than interactions in the bulk solvent, with the nearest solvent layer interacting specifically with up to three surface hydroxyl groups. Nevertheless, distinct structural perturbation of the solvent extends in every case no more than about 10 Å from the surface, and the perturbation is only strong in the immediate solvation layer. Furthermore, the corresponding dynamical perturbation of the solvent, as measured by the diffusion rates and reorientation times in comparison to the bulk, is always relatively small. For the hydrophilic case, it is largest, but even here it is less than a factor of 5 at the immediate interface and less than a factor of 2 in the second hydration layer. The residence time for solvent at the interface is found to be insensitive to the hydrophilicity of the surface. Calculated nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) order parameters for the solvent are found to reflect solvent orientational ordering, but are shown not to be distinctive of the nature of that order.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Interfacial Water at Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Surfaces: Slip, Viscosity, and Diffusion
Sendner, C., Horinek, D., Bocquet, L., & Netz, R. R. (2009) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la901314b · Cited by 567
Molecular reactions at aqueous interfaces
Ruiz-Lopez, M. F., Francisco, J. S., Martins-Costa, M. T. C., & Anglada, J. M. (2020) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-020-0203-2 · Cited by 411
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Water Structure and Diffusion in Silica Nanopores
Bourg, I. C., & Steefel, C. I. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp301299a · Cited by 286
Molecular simulation of water confined in nanoporous silica
Bonnaud, P. A., Coasne, B., & Pellenq, R. J.-M. (2010) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/28/284110 · Cited by 182
Giovambattista, N., Rossky, P. J., & Debenedetti, P. G. (2012) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-032811-112007 · Cited by 149
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, S. H., & Rossky, P. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1994-02-15
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3334-3345
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2084384492
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of the structure and dynamics of liquid water at hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces—a molecular dynamics simulation study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.466425
- The paper
- Lee, S. H., & Rossky, P. J. (1994). A comparison of the structure and dynamics of liquid water at hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces—a molecular dynamics simulation study. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.466425
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.