The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of exact and approximate density functionals for an exactly soluble model
Abstract
We consider a model, given by two interacting electrons in an external harmonic potential, that can be solved analytically for a discrete and infinite set of values of the spring constant. The knowledge of the exact electronic density allows us to construct the exact exchange–correlation potential and exchange–correlation energy by inverting the Kohn–Sham equation. The exact exchange–correlation potential and energy are compared with the corresponding quantities, obtained for the same densities, using approximate density functionals, namely the local density approximation and several generalized gradient approximations. We consider two values of the spring constant in order to study the system in the low correlation case (high value of the spring constant) and in the high correlation case (low value of the spring constant). In both cases, the exchange–correlation potentials corresponding to approximate density functionals differ from the exact one over the entire spatial range. The approximate correlation potentials bear no resemblance to the exact ones. The exchange energy for generalized gradient approximation functionals is much improved compared to the result obtained within the local density approximation but the correlation energy is only a little improved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Quantum Monte Carlo simulations of solids
Foulkes, W. M. C., Mitas, L., Needs, R. J., & Rajagopal, G. (2001) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.33 · Cited by 2,336
Adiabatic density-functional perturbation theory
Gonze, X. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.1096 · Cited by 667
Harmonic-Potential Theorem: Implications for Approximate Many-Body Theories
Dobson, J. F. (1994) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.73.2244 · Cited by 321
Derivation of a Generalized Gradient Approximation: The PW91 Density Functional
Burke, K., Perdew, J. P., & Wang, Y. (1998) · Electronic Density Functional Theory · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0316-7_7 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Filippi, C., Umrigar, C. J., & Taut, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1994-01-15
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1290-1296
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2046379387
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of exact and approximate density functionals for an exactly soluble model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.466658
- The paper
- Filippi, C., Umrigar, C. J., & Taut, M. (1994). Comparison of exact and approximate density functionals for an exactly soluble model. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.466658
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.