Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A systematic comparison of molecular properties obtained using Hartree–Fock, a hybrid Hartree–Fock density-functional-theory, and coupled-cluster methods

Oliphant, Nevin, Bartlett, Rodney J.·1994·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

We present results of a systematic study of the theoretical determination of equilibrium geometries, harmonic frequencies, total atomization energies, and dipole moments using Hartree–Fock, a hybrid Hartree–Fock density-functional-theory, and coupled-cluster methods in conjunction with a triple zeta basis set for a large set of molecules. This allows a direct comparison of the three theoretical methods applied to a range of chemical systems. The average errors (‖experimental value-theoretical value‖) for the Hartree–Fock, hybrid Hartree–Fock density-functional-theory, and coupled-cluster methods, respectively, are bond length (Å) 0.022, 0.005, 0.005; bond angle (degrees) 2.7, 1.7, 1.9; harmonic frequencies (cm−1) 144, 40, 30; atomization energies (kcal/mol) 81.9, 3.6, 11.5; and dipole moments (debye) 0.29, 0.14, 0.10. This clearly demonstrates that the relatively inexpensive hybrid Hartree–Fock density-functional-theory method yields results which represent a reliable, significant improvement over those obtained with the Hartree–Fock method. The results obtained using the hybrid Hartree–Fock density-functional-theory method are, in fact, quite comparable with the corresponding results obtained using the high level, ab initio coupled-cluster method. For certain difficult open shell examples, the hybrid Hartree–Fock density-functional theory using a spin restricted open shell Hartree–Fock density is much improved over the corresponding hybrid Hartree–Fock density-functional-theory results obtained using a spin unrestricted Hartree–Fock density.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.467064

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Oliphant, N., & Bartlett, R. J.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1994-05-01
Volume
100
Issue
9
Pages
6550-6561
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2007432258
Cited by
227
References
1
FWCI
14.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic comparison of molecular properties obtained using Hartree–Fock, a hybrid Hartree–Fock density-functional-theory, and coupled-cluster methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.467064
The paper
Oliphant, N., & Bartlett, R. J. (1994). A systematic comparison of molecular properties obtained using Hartree–Fock, a hybrid Hartree–Fock density-functional-theory, and coupled-cluster methods. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.467064

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.