The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An extended basis set ab initio study of Li+(H2O)n, n=1–6
Open accessAbstract
The structures, binding energies, and enthalpies of small molecular clusters incorporating a single lithium cation and up through six waters have been determined with extended Gaussian basis sets using Hartree–Fock and post-Hartree–Fock methods. The resulting properties are analyzed with respect to both basis set completeness and degree of correlation recovery, including core–core and core–valence effects. Although the lithium–water interaction is largely electrostatic in nature, small basis sets, lacking in polarization and near-valence diffuse functions, drastically overestimate the strength of the bond (by 20 kcal/mol or more) and underestimate the Li+...O distance by up to 0.1 Å. Their poor performance is attributable to inherent errors in describing the electric moments and polarizability of water and to large basis set superposition errors. Thus, the accuracy with which the fundamental lithium–water interaction could be modeled was primarily dependent on the quality of the Gaussian basis set and not upon the level of correlation recovery. Basis set enlargement and correlation effects both tend to reduce the strength of the Li+(H2O) bond, but produce corrections of opposite sign for the Li+...O bond length. Although correlation effects play a minor role in describing the lithium–water interaction, as the size of the cluster increases and the number of waters involved in multiple hydrogen bonds grows, correlation recovery can become significant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hydrogen Bond Energy of the Water Dimer
Feyereisen, M. W., Feller, D., & Dixon, D. A. (1996) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jp952860l · Cited by 531
Self-citationLamoureux, G., & Roux, B. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp056043p · Cited by 395
Noncovalent metal-ligand bond energies as studied by threshold collision-induced dissociation
Rodgers, M. T., & Armentrout, P. B. (2000) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/1098-2787(200007)19:4<215::aid-mas2>3.0.co;2-x · Cited by 354
Statistical modeling of competitive threshold collision-induced dissociation
Rodgers, M. T., & Armentrout, P. B. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.476754 · Cited by 253
On the structure and thermodynamics of solvated monoatomic ions using a hybrid solvation model
Topol, I. A., Tawa, G. J., Burt, S. K., & Rashin, A. A. (1999) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.480486 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Feller, D., Glendening, E. D., Kendall, R. A., & Peterson, K. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1994-04-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 4981-4997
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2010050820
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An extended basis set ab initio study of Li+(H2O)n, n=1–6. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.467217
- The paper
- Feller, D., Glendening, E. D., Kendall, R. A., & Peterson, K. A. (1994). An extended basis set ab initio study of Li+(H2O)n, n=1–6. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.467217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.