Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Energy-structure relationships for microscopic solvation of anions in water clusters

Combariza, Jaime E., Kestner, Neil R., Jortner, Joshua·1994·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

In this paper we present a quantum-mechanical study of anions in water clusters, X−(H2O)n (X=Cl, Br, I, and n=1–6). Molecular orbital calculations at the self-consistent field (SCF) level and at the second-order Mo/ller–Plesset (MP2) level were performed using extended basis sets. Full structural optimization was conducted at the MP2 level for n=1 and at the SCF level for n=2–6. The energies and charge distribution of X−(H2O) were calculated at the MP2 level, while the energies of the X−(H2O)n (n=2–6) clusters were calculated at the MP2 level using the SCF optimized geometry. Calculations of total and sequential enthalpies of hydration and for the vertical ionization potentials were conducted for X−(H2O), the hydrogen bonded and linear isomers of X−(H2O)2, the pyramidal structure of X−(H2O)3, and the interior and surface isomers of X−(H2O)n, n=4–6. The calculated hydration enthalpies account well for their experimental size dependence for n=1–6. However, the isomer specificity of the hydration enthalpies is reflected by a small energy difference (δ=1–5 kcal mol−1) between the surface and interior isomers at a fixed n, precluding the assignment of structural isomers on the basis of ground-state energetics. The cluster size dependence and isomer specificity of the calculated vertical ionization potentials in conjunction with experimental data provide a diagnostic tool for the structural assignment of isomers and for the distinction between surface and interior structures. The central prediction emerging from the structure-energetic relations based on cluster size dependence and isomer specificity of vertical ionization potentials, is the prevalence of surface structures for Cl−(H2O)n (n=2–6), Br−(H2O)n (n=2–6), and I−(H2O)n (n=2–5), while a ‘‘transition’’ from surface to interior structure may be exhibited for I−(H2O)6.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.467231

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
Combariza, J. E., Kestner, N. R., & Jortner, J.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1994-02-15
Volume
100
Issue
4
Pages
2851-2864
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2047881175
Cited by
224
References
0
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Energy-structure relationships for microscopic solvation of anions in water clusters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.467231
The paper
Combariza, J. E., Kestner, N. R., & Jortner, J. (1994). Energy-structure relationships for microscopic solvation of anions in water clusters. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.467231

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.