The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proton transfer in solution: Molecular dynamics with quantum transitions
Abstract
We apply ‘‘molecular dynamics with quantum transitions’’ (MDQT), a surface-hopping method previously used only for electronic transitions, to proton transfer in solution, where the quantum particle is an atom. We use full classical mechanical molecular dynamics for the heavy atom degrees of freedom, including the solvent molecules, and treat the hydrogen motion quantum mechanically. We identify new obstacles that arise in this application of MDQT and present methods for overcoming them. We implement these new methods to demonstrate that application of MDQT to proton transfer in solution is computationally feasible and appears capable of accurately incorporating quantum mechanical phenomena such as tunneling and isotope effects. As an initial application of the method, we employ a model used previously by Azzouz and Borgis to represent the proton transfer reaction AH–B■A−–H+B in liquid methyl chloride, where the AH–B complex corresponds to a typical phenol–amine complex. We have chosen this model, in part, because it exhibits both adiabatic and diabatic behavior, thereby offering a stringent test of the theory. MDQT proves capable of treating both limits, as well as the intermediate regime. Up to four quantum states were included in this simulation, and the method can easily be extended to include additional excited states, so it can be applied to a wide range of processes, such as photoassisted tunneling. In addition, this method is not perturbative, so trajectories can be continued after the barrier is crossed to follow the subsequent dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Cited by
Kreuer, K.-D., Paddison, S. J., Spohr, E., & Schuster, M. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020715f · Cited by 2,187
Recent Advances and Perspectives on Nonadiabatic Mixed Quantum–Classical Dynamics
Crespo-Otero, R., & Barbatti, M. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577 · Cited by 733
Multireference Electron Correlation Methods: Journeys along Potential Energy Surfaces
Park, J. W., Al-Saadon, R., MacLeod, M. K., Shiozaki, T., & Vlaisavljevich, B. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00496 · Cited by 155
Iterative linearized approach to nonadiabatic dynamics
Dunkel, E. R., Bonella, S., & Coker, D. F. (2008) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2976441 · Cited by 76
Marchetti, B., & Karsili, T. N. V. (2016) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c5cp06767g · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammes-Schiffer, S., & Tully, J. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1994-09-15
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4657-4667
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2066556212
- Cited by
- 1,360
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.