Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5,804

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms

Martyna, Glenn J., Tobias, Douglas J., Klein, Michael L.·1994·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Modularly invariant equations of motion are derived that generate the isothermal–isobaric ensemble as their phase space averages. Isotropic volume fluctuations and fully flexible simulation cells as well as a hybrid scheme that naturally combines the two motions are considered. The resulting methods are tested on two problems, a particle in a one-dimensional periodic potential and a spherical model of C60 in the solid/fluid phase.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.467468

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 5,804

Metadata

Authors
Martyna, G. J., Tobias, D. J., & Klein, M. L.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1994-09-01
Volume
101
Issue
5
Pages
4177-4189
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W1972758026
Cited by
5,804
References
1
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.467468
The paper
Martyna, G. J., Tobias, D. J., & Klein, M. L. (1994). Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.467468

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.