Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,442

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations

Tironi, Ilario G., Sperb, René, Smith, Paul E., van Gunsteren, Wilfred F.·1995·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations of ionic systems require the inclusion of long-range electrostatic forces. We propose an expression for the long-range electrostatic forces based on an analytical solution of the Poisson–Boltzmann equation outside a spherical cutoff, which can easily be implemented in molecular simulation programs. An analytical solution of the linearized Poisson–Boltzmann (PB) equation valid in a spherical region is obtained. From this general solution special expressions are derived for evaluating the electrostatic potential and its derivative at the origin of the sphere. These expressions have been implemented for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, such that the surface of the cutoff sphere around a charged particle is identified with the spherical boundary of the Poisson–Boltzmann problem. The analytical solution of the Poisson–Boltzmann equation is valid for the cutoff sphere and can be used for calculating the reaction field forces on the central charge, assuming a uniform continuum of given ionic strength beyond the cutoff. MD simulations are performed for a periodic system consisting of 2127 SPC water molecules with 40 NaCl ions (1 molar). We compare the structural and dynamical results obtained from MD simulations in which the long range electrostatic interactions are treated differently; using a cutoff radius, using a cutoff radius and a Poisson–Boltzmann generalized reaction field force, and using the Ewald summation. Application of the Poisson–Boltzmann generalized reaction field gives a dramatic improvement of the structure of the solution compared to a simple cutoff treatment, at no extra computational cost.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.469273

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,442

Metadata

Authors
Tironi, I. G., Sperb, R., Smith, P. E., & van Gunsteren, W. F.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1995-04-01
Volume
102
Issue
13
Pages
5451-5459
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2027154929
Cited by
1,442
References
2
FWCI
7.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.469273
The paper
Tironi, I. G., Sperb, R., Smith, P. E., & van Gunsteren, W. F. (1995). A generalized reaction field method for molecular dynamics simulations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.469273

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.