The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural network models of potential energy surfaces
Abstract
Neural networks provide an efficient, general interpolation method for nonlinear functions of several variables. This paper describes the use of feed-forward neural networks to model global properties of potential energy surfaces from information available at a limited number of configurations. As an initial demonstration of the method, several fits are made to data derived from an empirical potential model of CO adsorbed on Ni(111). The data are error-free and geometries are selected from uniform grids of two and three dimensions. The neural network model predicts the potential to within a few hundredths of a kcal/mole at arbitrary geometries. The accuracy and efficiency of the neural network in practical calculations are demonstrated in quantum transition state theory rate calculations for surface diffusion of CO/Ni(111) using a Monte Carlo/path integral method. The network model is much faster to evaluate than the original potential from which it is derived. As a more complex test of the method, the interaction potential of H2 with the Si(100)-2×1 surface is determined as a function of 12 degrees of freedom from energies calculated with the local density functional method at 750 geometries. The training examples are not uniformly spaced and they depend weakly on variables not included in the fit. The neural net model predicts the potential at geometries outside the training set with a mean absolute deviation of 2.1 kcal/mole.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function
Cybenko, G. (1989) · Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems · doi:10.1007/bf02551274 · Cited by 13,883
Cited by
Generalized Neural-Network Representation of High-Dimensional Potential-Energy Surfaces
Behler, J., & Parrinello, M. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.146401 · Cited by 5,010
On representing chemical environments
Bartók, A. P., Kondor, R., & Csányi, G. (2013) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.184115 · Cited by 2,572
Unke, O. T., Chmiela, S., Sauceda, H. E., Gastegger, M., Poltavsky, I., Schütt, K. T., Tkatchenko, A., & Müller, K.-R. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01111 · Cited by 1,647
Constructing high‐dimensional neural network potentials: A tutorial review
Behler, J. (2015) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24890 · Cited by 884
Neural network potential-energy surfaces in chemistry: a tool for large-scale simulations
Behler, J. (2011) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c1cp21668f · Cited by 781
Metadata
- Authors
- Blank, T. B., Brown, S. D., Calhoun, A. W., & Doren, D. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1995-09-08
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4129-4137
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2061179540
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural network models of potential energy surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.469597
- The paper
- Blank, T. B., Brown, S. D., Calhoun, A. W., & Doren, D. J. (1995). Neural network models of potential energy surfaces. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.469597
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.