The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perturbative treatment of the similarity transformed Hamiltonian in equation-of-motion coupled-cluster approximations
Abstract
A series of size-consistent approximations to the equation-of-motion coupled cluster method in the singles and doubles approximation (EOM-CCSD) are developed by subjecting the similarity transformed Hamiltonian H̄=exp(−T)H exp(T) to a perturbation expansion. Attention is directed to N and N−1 electron final state realizations of the method defined by truncation of H̄ at second order. Explicit spin–orbital equations for the energy and its first derivative are documented for both approaches [EOMEE-CCSD(2) and EOMIP-CCSD(2), respectively], and have been implemented in a large-scale quantum chemistry program. Vertical ionization potentials calculated by EOMIP-CCSD(2) are shown to be equivalent to those of an approach presented recently by Nooijen and Snijders [J. Chem. Phys. 102, 1681 (1995)]. Applications of both EOMIP-CCSD(2) and EOMEE-CCSD(2) provide results for final state properties that compare favorably with those obtained in full EOM-CCSD calculations. Analysis of the computational aspects of the approximate and full EOM-CCSD methods shows that the cost of EOMIP-CCSD(2) energy and gradient calculations scales in proportion to the fifth power of the basis set size, a significant savings over the sixth power dependence of EOMIP-CCSD. This feature is of great practical importance, as it shows that this N−1 electron final state approach has a large domain of applicability and is therefore likely to become a valuable tool for application calculations. On the other hand, the same cannot be said for EOMEE-CCSD(2) since its asymptotic computational dependence and storage requirements are the same as the full EOMEE-CCSD method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coupled-cluster techniques for computational chemistry: The CFOUR program package
Matthews, D. A., Cheng, L., Harding, M. E., Lipparini, F., Stopkowicz, S., Jagau, T.-C., Szalay, P. G., Gauss, J., & Stanton, J. F. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0004837 · Cited by 729
Self-citationKöhn, A., & Hättig, C. (2003) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1597635 · Cited by 390
Similarity transformed equation-of-motion coupled-cluster theory: Details, examples, and comparisons
Nooijen, M., & Bartlett, R. J. (1997) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.474922 · Cited by 368
Ortiz, J. V. (1996) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.471468 · Cited by 314
Quantitative quantum chemistry
Helgaker, T., Klopper, W., & Tew, D. P. (2008) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268970802258591 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Stanton, J. F., & Gauss, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1995-07-15
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1064-1076
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2018393135
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perturbative treatment of the similarity transformed Hamiltonian in equation-of-motion coupled-cluster approximations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.469817
- The paper
- Stanton, J. F., & Gauss, J. (1995). Perturbative treatment of the similarity transformed Hamiltonian in equation-of-motion coupled-cluster approximations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.469817
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.