Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 774

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Accuracy and efficiency of the particle mesh Ewald method

Petersen, Henrik G.·1995·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

In this article, a recently proposed method called the particle mesh Ewald (PME) method for computing the long ranged Coulomb interactions in for example molecular dynamics simulations is studied. The PME method has a complexity 𝒪(N log N), where N is the total number of charges. This complexity should in particular be compared with the complexity 𝒪(N3/2) for the well known Ewald method and 𝒪(N) for the rather new (but already famous) fast multipole method (FMM). However, these complexities say nothing about which method is fastest at some finite N. The purpose of this article is thus to study the PME method and compare its efficiency with the Ewald method and the fast multipole method. To enable this, a theoretical estimate for the accuracy of the PME method as function of its truncation parameters is derived. It is shown that this estimate is very precise by comparing it with results obtained from molecular dynamics simulations of a molten NaCl. Based on this estimate and very careful time experiments, the overall necessary time overhead for the PME method as function of N and a required accuracy is predicted. By a direct comparison with a similar prediction for the Ewald method and by studying existing Ewald-FMM comparisons, it is found that the PME method is significantly faster than both the Ewald method and the fast multipole method in the important decades N≂104–105.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.470043

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 774

Metadata

Authors
Petersen, H. G.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1995-09-01
Volume
103
Issue
9
Pages
3668-3679
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2011601475
Cited by
774
References
0
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy and efficiency of the particle mesh Ewald method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.470043
The paper
Petersen, H. G. (1995). Accuracy and efficiency of the particle mesh Ewald method. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470043

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.