The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accuracy and efficiency of the particle mesh Ewald method
Abstract
In this article, a recently proposed method called the particle mesh Ewald (PME) method for computing the long ranged Coulomb interactions in for example molecular dynamics simulations is studied. The PME method has a complexity 𝒪(N log N), where N is the total number of charges. This complexity should in particular be compared with the complexity 𝒪(N3/2) for the well known Ewald method and 𝒪(N) for the rather new (but already famous) fast multipole method (FMM). However, these complexities say nothing about which method is fastest at some finite N. The purpose of this article is thus to study the PME method and compare its efficiency with the Ewald method and the fast multipole method. To enable this, a theoretical estimate for the accuracy of the PME method as function of its truncation parameters is derived. It is shown that this estimate is very precise by comparing it with results obtained from molecular dynamics simulations of a molten NaCl. Based on this estimate and very careful time experiments, the overall necessary time overhead for the PME method as function of N and a required accuracy is predicted. By a direct comparison with a similar prediction for the Ewald method and by studying existing Ewald-FMM comparisons, it is found that the PME method is significantly faster than both the Ewald method and the fast multipole method in the important decades N≂104–105.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A smooth particle mesh Ewald method
Essmann, U., Perera, L., Berkowitz, M. L., Darden, T., Lee, H., & Pedersen, L. G. (1995) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.470117 · Cited by 22,514
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
van der Spoel, D., van Maaren, P. J., & Berendsen, H. J. C. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.476482 · Cited by 659
Comments on P3M, FMM, and the Ewald method for large periodic Coulombic systems
Pollock, E. L., & Glosli, J. (1996) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/0010-4655(96)00043-4 · Cited by 422
Li, P., Song, L. F., & Merz, K. M. (2015) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp505875v · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Petersen, H. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1995-09-01
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3668-3679
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2011601475
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy and efficiency of the particle mesh Ewald method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.470043
- The paper
- Petersen, H. G. (1995). Accuracy and efficiency of the particle mesh Ewald method. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.