Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 579

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Response functions in the CC3 iterative triple excitation model

Christiansen, Ove, Koch, Henrik, Jo/rgensen, Poul·1995·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

The derivation of response functions for coupled cluster models is discussed in a context where approximations can be introduced in the coupled cluster equations. The linear response function is derived for the approximate coupled cluster singles, doubles, and triples model CC3. The linear response functions for the approximate triples models, CCSDT-1a and CCSDT-1b, are obtained as simplifications to the CC3 linear response function. The consequences of these simplifications are discussed for the evaluation of molecular properties, in particular, for excitation energies. Excitation energies obtained from the linear response eigenvalue equation are analyzed in orders of the fluctuation potential. Double replacement dominated excitations are correct through second order in all the triples models mentioned, whereas they are only correct to first order in the coupled cluster singles and doubles model (CCSD). Single replacement dominated excitation energies are correct through third order in CC3, while in CCSDT-1a, CCSDT-1b, and CCSD they are only correct through second order. Calculations of excitation energies are reported for CH+, N2, and C2H4 to illustrate the accuracy that can be obtained in the various triples models. The CH+ results are compared to full configuration interaction results, the C2H4 results are compared with complete active space second order perturbation theory (CASPT2) and experiment, and the N2 results are compared to experiment. Double replacement dominated excitations are improved significantly relative to CCSD in all the triples models mentioned, and is of the same quality in CC3 and CCSDT-1a. The single replacement dominated excitation are close to full configuration interaction results for the CC3 model and significantly improved relative to CCSD. The CCSDT-1 results for the single replacement dominated excitations are not improved compared to CCSD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.470315

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 579

Metadata

Authors
Christiansen, O., Koch, H., & Jo/rgensen, P.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1995-11-01
Volume
103
Issue
17
Pages
7429-7441
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2075322007
Cited by
579
References
21
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response functions in the CC3 iterative triple excitation model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.470315
The paper
Christiansen, O., Koch, H., & Jo/rgensen, P. (1995). Response functions in the CC3 iterative triple excitation model. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470315

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.