The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response functions in the CC3 iterative triple excitation model
Abstract
The derivation of response functions for coupled cluster models is discussed in a context where approximations can be introduced in the coupled cluster equations. The linear response function is derived for the approximate coupled cluster singles, doubles, and triples model CC3. The linear response functions for the approximate triples models, CCSDT-1a and CCSDT-1b, are obtained as simplifications to the CC3 linear response function. The consequences of these simplifications are discussed for the evaluation of molecular properties, in particular, for excitation energies. Excitation energies obtained from the linear response eigenvalue equation are analyzed in orders of the fluctuation potential. Double replacement dominated excitations are correct through second order in all the triples models mentioned, whereas they are only correct to first order in the coupled cluster singles and doubles model (CCSD). Single replacement dominated excitation energies are correct through third order in CC3, while in CCSDT-1a, CCSDT-1b, and CCSD they are only correct through second order. Calculations of excitation energies are reported for CH+, N2, and C2H4 to illustrate the accuracy that can be obtained in the various triples models. The CH+ results are compared to full configuration interaction results, the C2H4 results are compared with complete active space second order perturbation theory (CASPT2) and experiment, and the N2 results are compared to experiment. Double replacement dominated excitations are improved significantly relative to CCSD in all the triples models mentioned, and is of the same quality in CC3 and CCSDT-1a. The single replacement dominated excitation are close to full configuration interaction results for the CC3 model and significantly improved relative to CCSD. The CCSDT-1 results for the single replacement dominated excitations are not improved compared to CCSD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories
Raghavachari, K., Trucks, G. W., Pople, J. A., & Head-Gordon, M. (1989) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(89)87395-6 · Cited by 8,504
Andersson, K., Malmqvist, P.-Å., & Roos, B. O. (1992) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.462209 · Cited by 3,877
Second-order perturbation theory with a CASSCF reference function
Andersson, K., Malmqvist, P. A., Roos, B. O., Sadlej, A. J., & Wolinski, K. (1990) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100377a012 · Cited by 3,331
Stanton, J. F., & Bartlett, R. J. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464746 · Cited by 2,599
The full CCSDT model for molecular electronic structure
Noga, J., & Bartlett, R. J. (1987) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.452353 · Cited by 1,355
Coupled cluster response functions
Koch, H., & Jo/rgensen, P. (1990) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.458814 · Cited by 1,134
Self-citationTowards a full CCSDT model for electron correlation
Urban, M., Noga, J., Cole, S. J., & Bartlett, R. J. (1985) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.449067 · Cited by 925
Head-Gordon, M., Rico, R. J., Oumi, M., & Lee, T. J. (1994) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/0009-2614(94)00070-0 · Cited by 699
Koch, H., Jensen, H. J. A., Jo/rgensen, P., & Helgaker, T. (1990) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.458815 · Cited by 582
Self-citationA coupled cluster approach with triple excitations
Lee, Y. S., Kucharski, S. A., & Bartlett, R. J. (1984) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.447591 · Cited by 520
Cited by
Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry
Bartlett, R. J., & Musiał, M. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.291 · Cited by 3,343
Shiozaki, T., Győrffy, W., Celani, P., & Werner, H.-J. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3633329 · Cited by 561
Influence of Triplet Instabilities in TDDFT
Peach, M. J. G., Williamson, M. J., & Tozer, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct200651r · Cited by 384
PSI3: An open‐source Ab Initio electronic structure package
Crawford, T. D., Sherrill, C. D., Valeev, E. F., Fermann, J. T., King, R. A., Leininger, M. L., Brown, S. T., Janssen, C. L., Seidl, E. T., Kenny, J. P., et al. (2007) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20573 · Cited by 271
Higher-order equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods
Hirata, S. (2004) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1753556 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Christiansen, O., Koch, H., & Jo/rgensen, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1995-11-01
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 7429-7441
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2075322007
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response functions in the CC3 iterative triple excitation model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.470315
- The paper
- Christiansen, O., Koch, H., & Jo/rgensen, P. (1995). Response functions in the CC3 iterative triple excitation model. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.