Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,591

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A complete basis set model chemistry. V. Extensions to six or more heavy atoms

Ochterski, Joseph W., Petersson, G. A., Montgomery, J. A.·1996·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

The major source of error in most ab initio calculations of molecular energies is the truncation of the one-electron basis set. Extrapolation to the complete basis set second-order (CBS2) limit using the N−1 asymptotic convergence of N-configuration pair natural orbital (PNO) expansions can be combined with the use of relatively small basis sets for the higher-order (i.e., MP3, MP4, and QCI) correlation energy to develop cost effective computational models. Following this strategy, three new computational models denoted CBS-4, CBS-q, and CBS-Q, are introduced. The mean absolute deviations (MAD) from experiment for the 125 energies of the G2 test set are 2.0, 1.7, and 1.0 kcal/mol, respectively. These results compare favorably with the MAD for the more costly G2(MP2), G2, and CBS-QCI/APNO models (1.6, 1.2, and 0.5 kcal/mol, respectively). The error distributions over the G2 test set are indistinguishable from Gaussian distribution functions for all six models, indicating that the rms errors can be interpreted in the same way that experimental uncertainties are used to assess reliability. However, a broader range of examples reveals special difficulties presented by spin contamination, high molecular symmetry, and localization problems in molecules with multiple lone pairs on the same atom. These characteristics can occasionally result in errors several times the size expected from the Gaussian distributions. Each of the CBS models has a range of molecular size for which it is the most accurate computational model currently available. The largest calculations reported for these models include: The CBS-4 heat of formation of tetranitrohydrazine (91.5±5 kcal/mol), the CBS-4 and CBS-q isomerization energies for the conversion of azulene to naphthalene (ΔHcalc=−35.2±1.0 kcal/mol, ΔHexp=−35.3±2.2 kcal/mol), and the CBS-Q heat of formation of SF6 (ΔHcalc=−286.6±1.3 kcal/mol, ΔHexp=−288.3±0.2 kcal/mol). The CBS-Q value for the dissociation energy of a C–H bond in benzene (113.1±1.3 kcal/mol) is also in agreement with the most recent experimental result (112.0±0.6 kcal/mol). The CBS-QCI/APNO model is applicable to the prediction of the C–H bond dissociation energies for the primary (100.7±0.7 kcal/mol calc.) and secondary (97.7±0.7 kcal/mol calc., 97.1±0.4 kcal/mol exp.) hydrogens of propane.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.470985

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,591

Metadata

Authors
Ochterski, J. W., Petersson, G. A., & Montgomery, J. A.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1996-02-15
Volume
104
Issue
7
Pages
2598-2619
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W1998725642
Cited by
1,591
References
0
FWCI
36.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A complete basis set model chemistry. V. Extensions to six or more heavy atoms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.470985
The paper
Ochterski, J. W., Petersson, G. A., & Montgomery, J. A. (1996). A complete basis set model chemistry. V. Extensions to six or more heavy atoms. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470985

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.