Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 485

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Third-order nonlinear time domain probes of solvation dynamics

Open access
Joo, Taiha, Jia, Yiwei, Yu, Jae-Young, Lang, Matthew J., Fleming, Graham R.·1996·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Several closely related third-order nonlinear time-resolved spectroscopic techniques, pump/probe transient absorption, transient grating, and three pulse stimulated photon echo peak shift measurements, are investigated theoretically and experimentally. It is shown in detail, through the consideration of response functions and numerical simulations including both finite pulse durations and detuning from exact resonance, how the solvation dynamics are manifested in these third-order nonlinear time-resolved spectroscopies. It is shown that the three pulse stimulated photon echo peak shift measurement and the transient grating measurement can give accurate dynamical information, whereas transient absorption may not be a reliable technique for a study of solvation dynamics in some cases. The contribution of very slow or static (inhomogeneous) components to the dynamics, however, can only be obtained from the three pulse echo peak shift measurements. Comprehensive experimental measurements are presented to illustrate and corroborate the calculations. We show that it is possible to separate the intramolecular vibrational and solvent contributions to the dephasing (or optical lineshape). Furthermore it is shown that the solvation of polar solutes in polar protic solvents has rather universal characteristics. The initial ultrafast process, usually identified as an inertial response of solvent molecules, occurs on a ∼100 fs time scale, and is essentially identical in methanol, ethanol, and butanol. The amplitude of this ultrafast component does, however, decrease with increasing alcohol size in 1-alkanols. The diffusive (≳0.5 ps) regime of the solvation process shows a strong solvent dependence, and may be described satisfactorily by dielectric relaxation theories.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.471276

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Cited by

See all 485

Metadata

Authors
Joo, T., Jia, Y., Yu, J.-Y., Lang, M. J., & Fleming, G. R.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1996-04-22
Volume
104
Issue
16
Pages
6089-6108
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2046092966
Cited by
485
References
59
FWCI
17.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Third-order nonlinear time domain probes of solvation dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.471276
The paper
Joo, T., Jia, Y., Yu, J.-Y., Lang, M. J., & Fleming, G. R. (1996). Third-order nonlinear time domain probes of solvation dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.471276

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.