The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantum decoherence and the isotope effect in condensed phase nonadiabatic molecular dynamics simulations
Abstract
In this paper, we explore in detail the way in which quantum decoherence is treated in different mixed quantum-classical molecular dynamics algorithms. The quantum decoherence time proves to be a key ingredient in the production of accurate nonadiabatic dynamics from computer simulations. Based on a short time expansion to a semiclassical golden rule expression due to Neria and Nitzan [J. Chem. Phys. 99, 1109 (1993)], we develop a new computationally efficient method for estimating the decay of quantum coherence in condensed phase molecular simulations. Using the hydrated electron as an example, application of this method finds that quantum decoherence times are on the order of a few femtoseconds for condensed phase chemical systems and that they play a direct role in determining nonadiabatic transition rates. The decay of quantum coherence for the solvated electron is found to take ≊50% longer in D2O than in H2O, providing a rationalization for a long standing puzzle concerning the lack of experimentally observed isotope effect on the nonadiabatic transition rate: Although the nonadiabatic coupling is smaller in D2O due to smaller nuclear velocities, the smaller coupling in D2O adds coherently for a longer time than in H2O, leading to nearly identical nonadiabatic transition rates. The implications of this isotope dependence of the nonadiabatic transition rate on changes in the quantum decoherence time for electron transfer and other important chemical reactions are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent Advances and Perspectives on Nonadiabatic Mixed Quantum–Classical Dynamics
Crespo-Otero, R., & Barbatti, M. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577 · Cited by 733
Understanding the Surface Hopping View of Electronic Transitions and Decoherence
Subotnik, J. E., Jain, A., Landry, B., Petit, A., Ouyang, W., & Bellonzi, N. (2016) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112245 · Cited by 438
Ben-Nun, M., & Martı́nez, T. J. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.476142 · Cited by 399
Kambhampati, P. (2011) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp2058673 · Cited by 391
Mean-field molecular dynamics with surface hopping
Prezhdo, O. V., & Rossky, P. J. (1997) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.474382 · Cited by 320
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, B. J., Bittner, E. R., Prezhdo, O. V., & Rossky, P. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1996-04-15
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 5942-5955
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2038029283
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum decoherence and the isotope effect in condensed phase nonadiabatic molecular dynamics simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.471326
- The paper
- Schwartz, B. J., Bittner, E. R., Prezhdo, O. V., & Rossky, P. J. (1996). Quantum decoherence and the isotope effect in condensed phase nonadiabatic molecular dynamics simulations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.471326
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.