Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 208

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Concerning the applicability of density functional methods to atomic and molecular negative ions

Galbraith, John Morrison, Schaefer, Henry F.·1996·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

There is concern within theoretical chemistry that density functional methods are fundamentally in error for negative ions. We have tested this hypothesis by evaluating electron affinities for F and F2 with a variety of density functionals and extremely large, diffuse basis sets. In addition, we have observed the behavior of a known unbound system Ne−. We have found no convincing evidence to support the claims of negative ion instability with density functional methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.471933

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 208

Metadata

Authors
Galbraith, J. M., & Schaefer, H. F.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1996-07-08
Volume
105
Issue
2
Pages
862-864
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2005480450
Cited by
208
References
1
FWCI
12.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concerning the applicability of density functional methods to atomic and molecular negative ions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.471933
The paper
Galbraith, J. M., & Schaefer, H. F. (1996). Concerning the applicability of density functional methods to atomic and molecular negative ions. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.471933

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.