The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concerning the applicability of density functional methods to atomic and molecular negative ions
Abstract
There is concern within theoretical chemistry that density functional methods are fundamentally in error for negative ions. We have tested this hypothesis by evaluating electron affinities for F and F2 with a variety of density functionals and extremely large, diffuse basis sets. In addition, we have observed the behavior of a known unbound system Ne−. We have found no convincing evidence to support the claims of negative ion instability with density functional methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Cited by
Atomic and Molecular Electron Affinities: Photoelectron Experiments and Theoretical Computations
Rienstra-Kiracofe, J. C., Tschumper, G. S., Schaefer, H. F., Nandi, S., & Ellison, G. B. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr990044u · Cited by 1,258
Self-citationConstrained Density Functional Theory and Its Application in Long-Range Electron Transfer
Wu, Q., & Van Voorhis, T. (2006) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct0503163 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Galbraith, J. M., & Schaefer, H. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1996-07-08
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 862-864
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2005480450
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concerning the applicability of density functional methods to atomic and molecular negative ions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.471933
- The paper
- Galbraith, J. M., & Schaefer, H. F. (1996). Concerning the applicability of density functional methods to atomic and molecular negative ions. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.471933
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.