The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proton transfer in the ground and lowest excited states of malonaldehyde: A comparative density functional and post-Hartree–Fock study
Abstract
Intramolecular proton transfer in the ground and the lowest two excited electronic states of malonaldehyde has been investigated by using density functional and post-Hartree–Fock methods. Our best estimates of the energy barriers governing proton transfer in the ground and lowest triplet state are quite low (4.3 and 6.6 kcal/mol, respectively), whereas a significantly higher barrier (12.0 kcal/mol) is obtained for the second triplet state. The coupled cluster approach provides reliable results already with relatively compact basis sets, its only drawback being the very unfavorable scaling with the number of active electrons. Among the cheaper methods, those based on the many-body perturbative approach provide good results for the ground electronic state, but their performances strongly deteriorate for excited states. The overestimation of correlation energy by conventional density functional methods produces an excessive degree of conjugation in the backbone of malonaldehyde with the consequent underestimation of energy barriers governing proton transfer. A more coherent picture is offered by a hybrid density functional/Hartree–Fock approach, which couples good structural predictions with a reduced, although still not negligible, underestimation of energy barriers. Furthermore, different electronic states are described with comparable accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions
Krishnan, R., Binkley, J. S., Seeger, R., & Pople, J. A. (1980) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.438955 · Cited by 17,772
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Cited by
Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model
Adamo, C., & Barone, V. (1999) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.478522 · Cited by 19,042
Self-citationAdamo, C., & Barone, V. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.475428 · Cited by 3,436
Self-citationAccurate excitation energies from time-dependent density functional theory: Assessing the PBE0 model
Adamo, C., Scuseria, G. E., & Barone, V. (1999) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.479571 · Cited by 758
Self-citationGilli, P., Bertolasi, V., Pretto, L., Lyčka, A., & Gilli, G. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja020589x · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Barone, V., & Adamo, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1996-12-22
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 11007-11019
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2016584020
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proton transfer in the ground and lowest excited states of malonaldehyde: A comparative density functional and post-Hartree–Fock study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.472900
- The paper
- Barone, V., & Adamo, C. (1996). Proton transfer in the ground and lowest excited states of malonaldehyde: A comparative density functional and post-Hartree–Fock study. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.472900
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.