The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The CC3 model: An iterative coupled cluster approach including connected triples
Open accessAbstract
An alternative derivation of many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) has been given, where a coupled cluster parametrization is used for the wave function and the method of undetermined Lagrange multipliers is applied to set up a variational coupled cluster energy expression. In this variational formulation, the nth-order amplitudes determine the energy to order 2n+1 and the nth-order multipliers determine the energy to order 2n+2. We have developed an iterative approximate coupled cluster singles, doubles, and triples model CC3, where the triples amplitudes are correct through second order and the singles amplitudes are treated without approximations due to the unique role of singles as approximate orbital relaxation parameters. The compact energy expressions obtained from the variational formulation exhibit in a simple way the relationship between CC3, CCSDT-1a [Lee et al., J. Chem. Phys. 81, 5906 (1984)] CCSDT-1b models [Urban et al., J. Chem. Phys. 83, 4041 (1985)], and the CCSD(T) model [Raghavachari et al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 157, 479 (1989)]. Sample calculations of total energies are presented for the molecules H2O, C2, CO, and C2H4. Comparisons are made with full CCSDT, CCSDT-1a, CCSDT-1b, CCSD(T), and full configuration interaction (FCI) results. These calculations demonstrate that CC3 and CCSD(T) give total energies of a similar quality. If results obtained by CC3 and CCSD(T) differ significantly, neither method can be trusted. In contrast to CCSD(T), time-dependent response functions can be obtained for CC3.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Psi4: an open‐source ab initio electronic structure program
Turney, J. M., Simmonett, A. C., Parrish, R. M., Hohenstein, E. G., Evangelista, F. A., Fermann, J. T., Mintz, B. J., Burns, L. A., Wilke, J. J., Abrams, M. L., et al. (2012) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.93 · Cited by 1,083
PSI3: An open‐source Ab Initio electronic structure package
Crawford, T. D., Sherrill, C. D., Valeev, E. F., Fermann, J. T., King, R. A., Leininger, M. L., Brown, S. T., Janssen, C. L., Seidl, E. T., Kenny, J. P., et al. (2007) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20573 · Cited by 271
Quantitative quantum chemistry
Helgaker, T., Klopper, W., & Tew, D. P. (2008) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268970802258591 · Cited by 255
Probing ultrafast ππ*/nπ* internal conversion in organic chromophores via K-edge resonant absorption
Wolf, T. J. A., Myhre, R. H., Cryan, J. P., Coriani, S., Squibb, R. J., Battistoni, A., Berrah, N., Bostedt, C., Bucksbaum, P., Coslovich, G., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00069-7 · Cited by 197
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Koch, H., Christiansen, O., Jo/rgensen, P., Sanchez de Merás, A. M., & Helgaker, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1997-02-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1808-1818
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2059807451
- Cited by
- 511
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The CC3 model: An iterative coupled cluster approach including connected triples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.473322
- The paper
- Koch, H., Christiansen, O., Jo/rgensen, P., Sanchez de Merás, A. M., & Helgaker, T. (1997). The CC3 model: An iterative coupled cluster approach including connected triples. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.473322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.