The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A generalized many-body expansion and a unified view of fragment-based methods in electronic structure theory
Abstract
Fragment-based quantum chemistry methods are a promising route towards massively parallel electronic structure calculations in large systems. Unfortunately, the literature on this topic consists of a bewildering array of different methods, with no clear guiding principles to choose amongst them. Here, we introduce a conceptual framework that unifies many of these ostensibly disparate approaches. The common framework is based upon an approximate supersystem energy formula for a collection of intersecting (i.e., overlapping) fragments. This formula generalizes the traditional many-body expansion to cases where the “bodies” (fragments) share some nuclei in common, and reduces to the traditional many-body expansion for non-overlapping fragments. We illustrate how numerous fragment-based methods fit within this framework. Preliminary applications to molecular and ionic clusters suggest that two-body methods in which dimers are constructed from intersecting fragments may be a route to achieve very high accuracy in fragment-based calculations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Current Status of the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field
Ponder, J. W., Wu, C., Ren, P., Pande, V. S., Chodera, J. D., Schnieders, M. J., Haque, I., Mobley, D. L., Lambrecht, D. S., DiStasio, R. A., et al. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp910674d · Cited by 1,440
Cited by
From DFT to machine learning: recent approaches to materials science–a review
Schleder, G. R., Padilha, A. C. M., Acosta, C. M., Costa, M., & Fazzio, A. (2019) · Journal of Physics: Materials · doi:10.1088/2515-7639/ab084b · Cited by 852
Physics-Inspired Structural Representations for Molecules and Materials
Musil, F., Grisafi, A., Bartók, A. P., Ortner, C., Csányi, G., & Ceriotti, M. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00021 · Cited by 523
Computational electrochemistry: prediction of liquid-phase reduction potentials
Marenich, A. V., Ho, J., Coote, M. L., Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c4cp01572j · Cited by 508
Medders, G. R., Babin, V., & Paesani, F. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct5004115 · Cited by 435
The many-body expansion combined with neural networks
Yao, K., Herr, J. E., & Parkhill, J. (2017) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4973380 · Cited by 120
“3,6,9,21 .”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Richard, R. M., & Herbert, J. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-08-13
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 064113-064113
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2031694014
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A generalized many-body expansion and a unified view of fragment-based methods in electronic structure theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.4742816
- The paper
- Richard, R. M., & Herbert, J. M. (2012). A generalized many-body expansion and a unified view of fragment-based methods in electronic structure theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4742816
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.