The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of quantum transition rates from quantum-classical molecular dynamics simulations
Abstract
The impact of quantum decoherence and zero point motion on non-adiabatic transition rates in condensed matter systems is studied in relation to non-adiabatic (NA) molecular dynamics (MD) techniques. Both effects, and decoherence in particular, strongly influence the transition rate, while neither is accounted for by straightforward quantum-classical approaches. Quantum corrections to the quantum-classical results are rigorously introduced based on Kubo’s generating function formulation of Fermi’s Golden rule and the frozen Gaussian approximation for the nuclear wave functions. The development provides a one-to-one correspondence between the decoherence function and the Franck–Condon factor. The decoherence function defined in this paper corrects an error in our previous work [J. Chem. Phys. 104, 5942 (1996)]. The relationship between the short time approach and the real time NA MD is investigated and a specific prescription for incorporating quantum decoherence into NA simulations is given. The proposed scheme is applied to the hydrated electron. The rate of excited state non-radiative relaxation is found to be very sensitive to the decoherence time. Quantum coherence decays about 50% faster in H2O than in D2O, providing a theoretical rationalization for the lack of experimentally observed solvent isotope effect on the relaxation rate. Microscopic analysis of solvent mode contributions to the coherence decay shows that librational degrees of freedom are primarily responsible, due to the strong coupling between the electron and molecular rotations and to the small widths of the wave packets describing these modes. Zero point motion of the O–H bonds decreases the life time of the excited state of the hydrated electron by a factor of 1.3–1.5. The implications of the use of short time approximations for the NA transition rate and for the evolution of the nuclear wave functions are considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system
Leggett, A. J., Chakravarty, S., Dorsey, A. T., Fisher, M. P. A., Garg, A., & Zwerger, W. (1987) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.59.1 · Cited by 5,109
Cited by
Recent Advances and Perspectives on Nonadiabatic Mixed Quantum–Classical Dynamics
Crespo-Otero, R., & Barbatti, M. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577 · Cited by 733
Akimov, A. V., & Prezhdo, O. V. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct400934c · Cited by 608
Self-citationUnderstanding the Surface Hopping View of Electronic Transitions and Decoherence
Subotnik, J. E., Jain, A., Landry, B., Petit, A., Ouyang, W., & Bellonzi, N. (2016) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112245 · Cited by 438
Huo, P., & Coker, D. F. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3498901 · Cited by 134
Pachón, L. A., & Brumer, P. (2012) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c2cp40815e · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Prezhdo, O. V., & Rossky, P. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1997-10-15
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 5863-5878
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1970022823
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of quantum transition rates from quantum-classical molecular dynamics simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.474312
- The paper
- Prezhdo, O. V., & Rossky, P. J. (1997). Evaluation of quantum transition rates from quantum-classical molecular dynamics simulations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.474312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.