The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exchange and correlation energy in density functional theory: Comparison of accurate density functional theory quantities with traditional Hartree–Fock based ones and generalized gradient approximations for the molecules Li2, N2, F2
Open accessAbstract
The density functional definition of exchange and correlation differs from the traditional one. In order to calculate the density functional theory (DFT), quantities accurately, molecular Kohn–Sham (KS) solutions have been obtained from ab initio wave functions for the homonuclear diatomic molecules Li2, N2, F2. These afford the construction of the KS determinant Ψs and the calculation of its total electronic energy EKS and the kinetic, nuclear-attraction and Coulomb repulsion components Ts, V, WH as well as the (DFT) exchange energy Ex and correlation energy Ec. Comparison of these DFT quantities has been made on one hand with the corresponding Hartree–Fock (HF) quantities and on the other hand with local density approximation (LDA) and generalized gradient approximation (GGA). Comparison with HF shows that the correlation errors in the components T, V, and WH of the total energy are much larger for HF than KS determinantal wave functions. However, the total energies EKS and EHF appear to be close to each other, as well as the exchange energies Ex and ExHF and correlation energies Ec and EcHF. The KS determinantal wave function and the KS orbitals therefore correspond to much improved kinetic and Coulombic energies, while having only a slightly larger total correlation energy. It is stressed that these properties of the Kohn–Sham orbitals make them very suitable for use in the molecular orbital theories of chemistry. Comparison of the accurate Kohn–Sham exchange and correlation energies with LDA and GGA shows that the GGA exchange energies are consistently too negative, while the GGA correlation energies are not negative enough. It is argued that the GGA exchange functionals represent effectively not only exchange, but also the molecular non-dynamical correlation, while the GGA correlation functionals represent dynamical correlation only.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
te Velde, G., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Baerends, E. J., Fonseca Guerra, C., van Gisbergen, S. J. A., Snijders, J. G., & Ziegler, T. (2001) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.1056 · Cited by 10,152
Self-citationHANDY, N. C., & COHEN, A. J. (2001) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268970010018431 · Cited by 1,640
Shao, Y., Head-Gordon, M., & Krylov, A. I. (2003) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1545679 · Cited by 722
Champagne, B., Perpète, E. A., van Gisbergen, S. J. A., Baerends, E.-J., Snijders, J. G., Soubra-Ghaoui, C., Robins, K. A., & Kirtman, B. (1998) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.477731 · Cited by 482
Self-citationChermette, H. (1998) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0010-8545(98)00179-9 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Gritsenko, O. V., Schipper, P. R. T., & Baerends, E. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5007-5015
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1600920748
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exchange and correlation energy in density functional theory: Comparison of accurate density functional theory quantities with traditional Hartree–Fock based ones and generalized gradient approximations for the molecules Li2, N2, F2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.474864
- The paper
- Gritsenko, O. V., Schipper, P. R. T., & Baerends, E. J. (1997). Exchange and correlation energy in density functional theory: Comparison of accurate density functional theory quantities with traditional Hartree–Fock based ones and generalized gradient approximations for the molecules Li2, N2, F2. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.474864
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.