Cited by 203Laser-Ablation Synthesis of NanoparticlesUltrasound and Cavitation PhenomenaLaser Material Processing Techniques

Nanoparticle formation in a cavitation bubble after pulsed laser ablation in liquid studied with high time resolution small angle x-ray scattering

Open access
Ibrahimkutty, Shyjumon, Wagener, Philipp, Menzel, Andreas, Plech, Anton, Barcikowski, Stephan·2012·Applied Physics Letters

Abstract

We investigated nanoparticle formation after pulsed laser ablation in liquid using time-resolved small angle x-ray scattering. Laser ablation of a gold target in water induces a cavitation bubble in which two different particle species could be identified at maximum bubble extension: (i) primary particles of about 8–10 nm diameter, which show a smooth concentration gradient starting from the target and can also be found outside the cavitation bubble in the free liquid and (ii) secondary particles in the range of 45 nm diameter which have highest concentration in the upper part of the cavitation bubble but do not penetrate into the liquid.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4750250

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 203

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [1]1. H. Zeng, X. W. Du, S. C. Singh, S. A. Kulinich, S. Yang, J. He, and W. Cai, Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 1333 (2012).
  2. [2]2. S. Barcikowski, F. Devesa, and K. Moldenhauer, J. Nanopart. Res. 11, 1883 (2009).
  3. [3]3. S. Petersen and S. Barcikowski, J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 19830 (2009).
  4. [4]4. P. Wagener, S. Faramarzi, A. Schwenke, R. Rosenfeld, and S. Barcikow- ski, Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 7231 (2011).
  5. [5]5. E. Stratakis, M. Barberoglou, C. Fotakis, G. Viau, C. Garcia, and G. A. Shafeev, Opt. Express 17, 12650 (2009).
  6. [6]6. K. Sasaki, T. Nakano, W. Soliman, and N. Takada, Appl. Phys. Express 2, 046501 (2009).
  7. [7]7. W. Soliman, N. Takada, and K. Sasaki, Appl. Phys. Express 3, 035201 (2010).
  8. [8]8. T. Tsuji, D.-H. Thang, Y. Okazaki, M. Nakanishi, Y. Tsuboi, and M. Tsuji, Appl. Surf. Sci. 254, 5224 (2008).
  9. [9]9. P. Wagener, A. Schwenke, B. N. Chichkov, and S. Barcikowski, J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 7618 (2010).
  10. [10]10. S. S. Mao, X. Mao, R. Greif, and R. E. Russo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 2464 (2000).
  11. [11]11. L. Lavisse, J.-L. Le Garrec, L. Hallo, J.-M. Jouvard, S. Charles, J. Perez, J. B. A. Mitchell, J. Decloux, M. Girault, V. Potin, H. Andrze- jewski, M. C. M. de Lucas, and S. Bourgeois, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 164103 (2012).
  12. [12]12. B. Henrich, A. Bergamaschi, C. Broennimann, R. Dinapoli, E. Eikenberry, I. Johnson, M. Kobas, P. Kraft, A. Mozzanica, and B. Schmitt, Nucl. Ins- trum. Methods A 607, 247 (2009).
  13. [13]13. A. Vogel, N. Linz, S. Freidank, and G. Paltauf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 038102 (2008).
  14. [14]14. V. Kotaidis and A. Plech, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 213102 (2005).
  15. [15]15. G. Beaucage, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 28, 717 (1995).
  16. [16]16. M. Sztucki, T. Narayanan, and G. Beaucage, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 114304 (2007).
  17. [17]17. A. Plech, A. Siems, V. Kotaidis, and M. Sztucki, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 3888 (2008).
  18. [18]18. A. Plech, V. Kotaidis, M. Lorenc, and M. Wulff, Chem. Phys. Lett. 401, 565 (2005).
  19. [19]19. T. E. Itina, J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 5044 (2011).
  20. [20]20. F. Mafun e, J. Kohno, Y. Takeda, and T. Kondow, J. Phys. Chem B 105, 5114 (2001).
  21. [21]21. W. Soliman, N. Takada, and K. Sasaki, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 50, 108003 (2011).
  22. [22]22. C. Sajti, A. Barchanski, P. Wagener, S. Klein, and S. Barcikowski, J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 5094 (2011).
  23. [23]23. S. Besner and M. Meunier, Laser Precision Manufacturing, edited by K. Sugioka, M. Meunier, and A. Piquet (Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2010), pp. 163-187.
  24. [24]24. S. Besner, A. V. Kabashin, and M. Meunier, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 233122 (2006).

Authors
Ibrahimkutty, S., Wagener, P., Menzel, A., Plech, A., & Barcikowski, S.
Affiliations
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Published
2012-09-03
Volume
101
Issue
10
Pages
103104
ISSN
  • 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
  • 1077-3118
OpenAlex
W1994438391
Cited by
203
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Applied Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Ultrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Laser Material Processing Techniques
Keywords
nanoparticle formation, cavitation bubbles, pulsed laser ablation in liquid, gold nanoparticles, time-resolved small-angle X-ray scattering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review