Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 203

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An assessment of theoretical procedures for the calculation of reliable free radical thermochemistry: A recommended new procedure

Mayer, Paul M., Parkinson, Christopher J., Smith, David M., Radom, Leo·1998·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

The ability to predict reliable thermochemical properties of molecules and ions has led to an ever increasing application of ab initio molecular orbital theory. Methods such as G2 theory have been shown to generally give accurate heats of formation (ΔfH) for closed-shell molecules and ions. Open-shell systems have been less thoroughly examined to date and the present paper attempts to redress this situation through a detailed assessment of the performance of a variety of levels of theory in calculating ΔfH values for free radicals. Representatives of three families of theoretical procedures have been studied: the infinite basis set extrapolation techniques of Martin, the CBS procedures of Petersson et al., and the G2 methods of Pople et al. Among the specific influences investigated are choice of geometry, zero-point vibrational energy, high level electron correlation treatment and basis set size. We recommend a new procedure called CBS-RAD for the treatment of free radicals. CBS-RAD is a modification of the CBS-Q method in which the geometry and zero-point energies are obtained at the QCISD/6-31G(d) level, and coupled-cluster theory is used in place of quadratic configuration interaction in single-point energy calculations. We find that for free radicals with low spin contamination G2 theory also performs adequately, but as 〈S2〉 increases the results of G2 calculations can become increasingly unsatisfactory. The recommended CBS-RAD procedure should yield more reliable results over a broader range of free radicals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.476256

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Mayer, P. M., Parkinson, C. J., Smith, D. M., & Radom, L.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1998-01-08
Volume
108
Issue
2
Pages
604-615
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W1990832500
Cited by
203
References
0
FWCI
13.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An assessment of theoretical procedures for the calculation of reliable free radical thermochemistry: A recommended new procedure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.476256
The paper
Mayer, P. M., Parkinson, C. J., Smith, D. M., & Radom, L. (1998). An assessment of theoretical procedures for the calculation of reliable free radical thermochemistry: A recommended new procedure. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.476256

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.