Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Theoretical analysis of electronic delocalization

Mo, Yirong, Peyerimhoff, Sigrid D.·1998·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

A block-localized wave function method is introduced to evaluate the electronic delocalization effect in molecules. The wave function for the hypothetical and strictly localized structure is constructed based on the assumption that all electrons and primitive basis functions can be divided into several subgroups; each localized molecular orbital is expanded in terms of primitive orbitals belonging to only one subgroup. The molecular orbitals belonging to the same subgroup are constrained to be mutually orthogonal, while those belonging to different subgroups are free to overlap. The final block-localized wave function at the Hartree–Fock level is expressed by a Slater determinant. In this manner, the energy difference between the Hartree–Fock wave function and the block-localized wave function can be generally defined as the electronic delocalization energy. The method is applied to two cases. The first concerns the resonance stabilization in the allyl ions. We find that the vertical resonance energies for the planar cation and anion are −45.7 (or −44.7) and −46.7 (or −48.2) kcal/mol at the HF/6-31G* (or 6-31+G*) level, respectively. Their rotational barriers are decomposed in terms of conjugation, hyperconjugation, steric effect, and pyramidalization. The n→σ* negative hyperconjugation in the staggered allyl anion is very strong and stabilizes the system by as much as −13 kcal/mol. The second concerns the hyperconjugation effect in propene. Our calculations suggest that the theoretical hyperconjugation energy in propene is about −5 kcal/mol, which is close to the experimental estimate (−2.7 kcal/mol) derived from the hydrogenation heats of propene and ethylene. Comparisons between the results based on the present block-localized wave function method and those based on the natural bond orbital method are presented and discussed. The examples demonstrate that the block-localized wave function method can be employed as a useful model to analyze chemical bondings and intuitive concepts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.476742

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Mo, Y., & Peyerimhoff, S. D.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
1998-08-01
Volume
109
Issue
5
Pages
1687-1697
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W1975160218
Cited by
341
References
0
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical analysis of electronic delocalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.476742
The paper
Mo, Y., & Peyerimhoff, S. D. (1998). Theoretical analysis of electronic delocalization. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.476742

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.