The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tensor hypercontraction. II. Least-squares renormalization
Abstract
The least-squares tensor hypercontraction (LS-THC) representation for the electron repulsion integral (ERI) tensor is presented. Recently, we developed the generic tensor hypercontraction (THC) ansatz, which represents the fourth-order ERI tensor as a product of five second-order tensors [E. G. Hohenstein, R. M. Parrish, and T. J. Martínez, J. Chem. Phys. 137, 044103 (2012)]10.1063/1.4732310. Our initial algorithm for the generation of the THC factors involved a two-sided invocation of overlap-metric density fitting, followed by a PARAFAC decomposition, and is denoted PARAFAC tensor hypercontraction (PF-THC). LS-THC supersedes PF-THC by producing the THC factors through a least-squares renormalization of a spatial quadrature over the otherwise singular 1/r12 operator. Remarkably, an analytical and simple formula for the LS-THC factors exists. Using this formula, the factors may be generated with \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}${\cal O}(N^5)$\end{document}O(N5) effort if exact integrals are decomposed, or \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}${\cal O}(N^4)$\end{document}O(N4) effort if the decomposition is applied to density-fitted integrals, using any choice of density fitting metric. The accuracy of LS-THC is explored for a range of systems using both conventional and density-fitted integrals in the context of MP2. The grid fitting error is found to be negligible even for extremely sparse spatial quadrature grids. For the case of density-fitted integrals, the additional error incurred by the grid fitting step is generally markedly smaller than the underlying Coulomb-metric density fitting error. The present results, coupled with our previously published factorizations of MP2 and MP3, provide an efficient, robust \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}${\cal O}(N^4)$\end{document}O(N4) approach to both methods. Moreover, LS-THC is generally applicable to many other methods in quantum chemistry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Seritan, S., Bannwarth, C., Fales, B. S., Hohenstein, E. G., Isborn, C. M., Kokkila‐Schumacher, S. I. L., Li, X., Liu, F., Luehr, N., Snyder, J. W., et al. (2021) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1494 · Cited by 312
Self-citationEven More Efficient Quantum Computations of Chemistry Through Tensor Hypercontraction
Lee, J., Berry, D. W., Gidney, C., Huggins, W. J., McClean, J. R., Wiebe, N., & Babbush, R. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030305 · Cited by 304
Quantum Computation of Electronic Transitions Using a Variational Quantum Eigensolver
Parrish, R. M., Hohenstein, E. G., McMahon, P. L., & Martínez, T. J. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.230401 · Cited by 282
Self-citationA Guided Tour of ab initio Nuclear Many-Body Theory
Hergert, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00379 · Cited by 269
Hybrid grid/basis set discretizations of the Schrödinger equation
White, S. R. (2017) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5007066 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Parrish, R. M., Hohenstein, E. G., Martínez, T. J., & Sherrill, C. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-12-11
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 224106-224106
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2040886698
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tensor hypercontraction. II. Least-squares renormalization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.4768233
- The paper
- Parrish, R. M., Hohenstein, E. G., Martínez, T. J., & Sherrill, C. D. (2012). Tensor hypercontraction. II. Least-squares renormalization. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4768233
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.