The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards standard methods for benchmark quality ab initio thermochemistry—W1 and W2 theory
Open accessAbstract
Two new schemes for computing molecular total atomization energies (TAEs) and/or heats of formation (ΔHf∘) of first- and second-row compounds to very high accuracy are presented. The more affordable scheme, W1 (Weizmann-1) theory, yields a mean absolute error of 0.30 kcal/mol and includes only a single, molecule-independent, empirical parameter. It requires CCSD (coupled cluster with all single and double substitutions) calculations in spdf and spdfg basis sets, while CCSD(T) (i.e., CCSD with a quasiperturbative treatment of connected triple excitations) calculations are only required in spd and spdf basis sets. On workstation computers and using conventional coupled cluster algorithms, systems as large as benzene can be treated, while larger systems are feasible using direct coupled cluster methods. The more rigorous scheme, W2 (Weizmann-2) theory, contains no empirical parameters at all and yields a mean absolute error of 0.23 kcal/mol, which is lowered to 0.18 kcal/mol for molecules dominated by dynamical correlation. It involves CCSD calculations in spdfg and spdfgh basis sets and CCSD(T) calculations in spdf and spdfg basis sets. On workstation computers, molecules with up to three heavy atoms can be treated using conventional coupled cluster algorithms, while larger systems can still be treated using a direct CCSD code. Both schemes include corrections for scalar relativistic effects, which are found to be vital for accurate results on second-row compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Cited by
Curtiss, L. A., Redfern, P. C., & Raghavachari, K. (2007) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2436888 · Cited by 2,115
A complete basis set model chemistry. VII. Use of the minimum population localization method
Montgomery, J. A., Frisch, M. J., Ochterski, J. W., & Petersson, G. A. (2000) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.481224 · Cited by 1,926
Atomic and Molecular Electron Affinities: Photoelectron Experiments and Theoretical Computations
Rienstra-Kiracofe, J. C., Tschumper, G. S., Schaefer, H. F., Nandi, S., & Ellison, G. B. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr990044u · Cited by 1,258
Fischer, H., & Radom, L. (2001) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20010417)40:8<1340::aid-anie1340>3.0.co;2-# · Cited by 709
Polarization consistent basis sets: Principles
Jensen, F. (2001) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1413524 · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, J. M. L., & de Oliveira, G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1999-08-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1843-1856
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2119193951
- Cited by
- 1,015
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards standard methods for benchmark quality ab initio thermochemistry—W1 and W2 theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.479454
- The paper
- Martin, J. M. L., & de Oliveira, G. (1999). Towards standard methods for benchmark quality ab initio thermochemistry—W1 and W2 theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.479454
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.