Cited by 69Protein Structure and DynamicsAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular InteractionsModel Reduction and Neural Networks

Hierarchical Nyström methods for constructing Markov state models for conformational dynamics

Open access
Yao, Yuan, Cui, Raymond Z., Bowman, Gregory R., Silva, Daniel-Adriano, Sun, Jian, Huang, Xuhui·2013·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Markov state models (MSMs) have become a popular approach for investigating the conformational dynamics of proteins and other biomolecules. MSMs are typically built from numerous molecular dynamics simulations by dividing the sampled configurations into a large number of microstates based on geometric criteria. The resulting microstate model can then be coarse-grained into a more understandable macrostate model by lumping together rapidly mixing microstates into larger, metastable aggregates. However, finite sampling often results in the creation of many poorly sampled microstates. During coarse-graining, these states are mistakenly identified as being kinetically important because transitions to/from them appear to be slow. In this paper, we propose a formalism based on an algebraic principle for matrix approximation, i.e., the Nyström method, to deal with such poorly sampled microstates. Our scheme builds a hierarchy of microstates from high to low populations and progressively applies spectral clustering on sets of microstates within each level of the hierarchy. It helps spectral clustering identify metastable aggregates with highly populated microstates rather than being distracted by lowly populated states. We demonstrate the ability of this algorithm to discover the major metastable states on two model systems, the alanine dipeptide and trpzip2 peptide.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4802007

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent methods such as Bayesian agglomerative clustering, hierarchical Nystrom, flux PCCA+, and HMM-based coarse-graining have proposed clustering methods to address statistical reliability.

    “Recent methods such as the Bayesian agglomerative clustering (BACE) method [33], a hierarchical Nystrom method [34], flux PCCA+ [35] and HMM-based coarse-graining [3] have proposed clustering methods to address this statistical reliability issue.”

    From Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics (2014) · cites this paper as [34]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. R. Zwanzig, J. Stat. Phys. 30, 255 (1983).
  2. G. R. Bowman, X. Huang, and V. S. Pande, Methods 49, 197 (2009).
  3. K. Beauchamp, G. R. Bowman, T. J. Lane, L. Maibaum, I. S. Haque, and V. S. Pande, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 3412 (2011).
  4. N. V. Buchete and G. Hummer, J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 6057 (2008).
  5. J. D. Chodera, N. Singhal, V. S. Pande, K. A. Dill, and W. C. Swope, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 155101 (2007).
  6. P. Deuflhard and M. Weber, Linear Algebra Appl. 398, 161 (2005).
  7. F. Noè and S. Fischer, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 154 (2008).
  8. W. Zheng, M. Andrec, E. Gallicchio, and R. M. Levy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 15340 (2007).
  9. A. Vitalis and A. Caflisch, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 1108 (2012).
  10. X. Huang, G. R. Bowman, S. Bacallado, and V. S. Pande, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 19765 (2009).
  11. B. Keller, P. Hünenberger, and W. F. van Gunsteren, J. Chem. Theory Com- put. 7, 1032 (2011).
  12. A. C. Pan and B. Roux, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 064107 (2008).
  13. C. Schüette, F. Noé, J. Lu, M. Sarich, and E. Vanden-Eijnden, J. Chem. Phys. 134, 204105 (2011).
  14. W. Zhuang, R. Z. Cui, D.-A. Silva, and X. Huang, J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 5415 (2011).
  15. R. Z. Cui, D.-A. Silva, J. Song, G. Bowman, W. Zhuang, and X. Huang, Curr. Phys. Chem. 2, 45 (2012).
  16. W. E and E. Vanden-Eijnden, J. Stat. Phys. 123, 503 (2006).
  17. P. Metzner, C. Schütte, and E. Vanden-Eijnden, Multiscale Model. Simul. 7, 1192 (2009).
  18. F. Noè, C. Schütte, E. Vanden-Eijnden, L. Reich, and T. R. Weikl, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 19011 (2009).
  19. G. R. Bowman, V. A. Voelz, and V. S. Pande, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21, 4 (2011).
  20. V. A. Voelz, G. R. Bowman, K. Beauchamp, and V. S. Pande, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 1526 (2010).
  21. K. Beauchamp, R. McGibbon, Y. Lin, and V. S. Pande, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 17807 (2012).
  22. G. R. Bowman, V. A. Voelz, and V. S. Pande, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 664 (2011).
  23. F. Morcos, S. Chatterjee, C. McClendon, P. R. Brenner, R. López-Rendón, J. Zintsmaster, M. Ercsey-Ravasz, C. Sweet, M. Jacobson, J. Peng, and J. Izaguirre, PLOS Comput. Biol. 6, e1001015 (2010).
  24. I. Buch, T. Giorgino, and G. De Fabritiis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 10184 (2011).
  25. D.-A. Silva, G. R. Bowman, A. Sosa-Peinado, and X. Huang, PLOS Com- put. Biol. 7, e1002054 (2011).
  26. M. Held, P. Metzner, J.-H. Prinz, and F. Noè, Biophys. J. 100, 701 (2011).
  27. G. R. Bowman, K. A. Beauchamp, G. Boxer, and V. S. Pande, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 124101 (2009).
  28. P. Deuflhard, W. Huisinga, A. Fischer, and C. Schütte, Linear Algebra Appl. 315, 39 (1998).
  29. Y. Yao, J. Sun, X. Huang, G. Bowman, G. Singh, M. Lesnick, V. Pande, L. J. Guibas, and G. Carlsson, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 144115 (2009).
  30. G. R. Bowman, J. Chem. Phys. 137, 134111 (2012).
  31. E. K. Rains and H. C. Andersen, J. Chem. Phys. 133, 144113 (2010).
  32. Y. Zhao, F. K. Sheong, J. Sun, P. Sander, and X. Huang, J. Comput. Chem. 34, 95 (2013).
  33. S. Bacallado, J. D. Chodera, and V. Pande, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 045106 (2009).
  34. A. G. Cochran, N. J. Skelton, and M. A. Starovasnik, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 5578 (2001).
  35. A. W. Smith, J. Lessing, Z. Ganim, C. S. Peng, A. Tokmakoff, S. Roy, T. L. C. Jansen, and J. Knoester, J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 10913 (2010).
  36. W. Y. Yang and M. Gruebele, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 7758 (2004).
  37. T. Wang, Y. Xu, D. Du, and F. Gai, Biopolymers 75, 163 (2004).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yao, Y., Cui, R. Z., Bowman, G. R., Silva, D.-A., Sun, J., & Huang, X.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2013-05-02
Volume
138
Issue
17
Pages
174106-174106
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W1993622915
Cited by
69
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Chemical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Microsoft Research
  • Adolph C. and Mary Sprague Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, University of California Berkeley
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (973 Program, 21273188, 61071157)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
  • Peking University
  • Microsoft Research Asia
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2013CB834703, 2011CB809105, 2012CB825501)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Keywords
Markov state models, conformational dynamics, Nyström method, hierarchical clustering, spectral clustering, metastable states, matrix approximation, alanine dipeptide, protein folding
MeSH terms
Dipeptides, Kinetics, Markov Chains, Molecular Conformation, Proteins, Thermodynamics, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review