Cited by 211Advanced Chemical Physics StudiesNonlinear Optical Materials ResearchSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ab initio analytical Raman intensities for periodic systems through a coupled perturbed Hartree-Fock/Kohn-Sham method in an atomic orbital basis. II. Validation and comparison with experiments

Open access

Abstract

In this work, we validate a new, fully analytical method for calculating Raman intensities of periodic systems, developed and presented in Paper I [L. Maschio, B. Kirtman, M. Rérat, R. Orlando, and R. Dovesi, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 164101 (2013)]. Our validation of this method and its implementation in the CRYSTAL code is done through several internal checks as well as comparison with experiment. The internal checks include consistency of results when increasing the number of periodic directions (from 0D to 1D, 2D, 3D), comparison with numerical differentiation, and a test of the sum rule for derivatives of the polarizability tensor. The choice of basis set as well as the Hamiltonian is also studied. Simulated Raman spectra of α-quartz and of the UiO-66 Metal-Organic Framework are compared with the experimental data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4824443

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Maschio, L., Kirtman, B., Rérat, M., Orlando, R., & Dovesi, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour (FR)
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2013-10-22
Volume
139
Issue
16
Pages
164102-164102
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2043159255
Cited by
211
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Chemical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Nonlinear Optical Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Keywords
Raman intensity, periodic systems, coupled perturbed Hartree-Fock, CRYSTAL code, polarizability tensor, sum rules, basis set effects, alpha-quartz, UiO-66, metal-organic frameworks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review