The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extending the applicability of the Tkatchenko-Scheffler dispersion correction via iterative Hirshfeld partitioning
Abstract
Recently we have demonstrated that the applicability of the Tkatchenko-Scheffler (TS) method for calculating dispersion corrections to density-functional theory can be extended to ionic systems if the Hirshfeld method for estimating effective volumes and charges of atoms in molecules or solids (AIM’s) is replaced by its iterative variant [T. Bučko, S. Lebègue, J. Hafner, and J. Ángyán, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 4293 (2013)]. The standard Hirshfeld method uses neutral atoms as a reference, whereas in the iterative Hirshfeld (HI) scheme the fractionally charged atomic reference states are determined self-consistently. We show that the HI method predicts more realistic AIM charges and that the TS/HI approach leads to polarizabilities and C6 dispersion coefficients in ionic or partially ionic systems which are, as expected, larger for anions than for cations (in contrast to the conventional TS method). For crystalline materials, the new algorithm predicts polarizabilities per unit cell in better agreement with the values derived from the Clausius-Mosotti equation. The applicability of the TS/HI method has been tested for a wide variety of molecular and solid-state systems. It is demonstrated that for systems dominated by covalent interactions and/or dispersion forces the TS/HI method leads to the same results as the conventional TS approach. The difference between the TS/HI and TS approaches increases with increasing ionicity. A detailed comparison is presented for isoelectronic series of octet compounds, layered crystals, complex intermetallic compounds, and hydrides, and for crystals built of molecules or containing molecular anions. It is demonstrated that only the TS/HI method leads to accurate results for systems where both electrostatic and dispersion interactions are important, as illustrated for Li-intercalated graphite and for molecular adsorption on the surfaces in ionic solids and in the cavities of zeolites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hermann, J., DiStasio, R. A., & Tkatchenko, A. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00446 · Cited by 657
Limas, N. G., & Manz, T. A. (2016) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c6ra05507a · Cited by 558
Williams, L., Mukherjee, A., Dasgupta, A., & Rajan, K. (2021) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/d1tc01972d · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Bučko, T., Lebègue, S., Ángyán, J. G., & Hafner, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2014-07-21
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 034114-034114
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2084225101
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extending the applicability of the Tkatchenko-Scheffler dispersion correction via iterative Hirshfeld partitioning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.4890003
- The paper
- Bučko, T., Lebègue, S., Ángyán, J. G., & Hafner, J. (2014). Extending the applicability of the Tkatchenko-Scheffler dispersion correction via iterative Hirshfeld partitioning. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4890003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.