The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The charge-asymmetric nonlocally determined local-electric (CANDLE) solvation model
Open accessAbstract
Many important applications of electronic structure methods involve molecules or solid surfaces in a solvent medium. Since explicit treatment of the solvent in such methods is usually not practical, calculations often employ continuum solvation models to approximate the effect of the solvent. Previous solvation models either involve a parametrization based on atomic radii, which limits the class of applicable solutes, or based on solute electron density, which is more general but less accurate, especially for charged systems. We develop an accurate and general solvation model that includes a cavity that is a nonlocal functional of both solute electron density and potential, local dielectric response on this nonlocally determined cavity, and nonlocal approximations to the cavity-formation and dispersion energies. The dependence of the cavity on the solute potential enables an explicit treatment of the solvent charge asymmetry. With four parameters per solvent, this “CANDLE” model simultaneously reproduces solvation energies of large datasets of neutral molecules, cations, and anions with a mean absolute error of 1.8 kcal/mol in water and 3.0 kcal/mol in acetonitrile.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Letchworth-Weaver, K., & Arias, T. A. (2012) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.075140 · Cited by 351
Cited by
Liu, D., Li, X., Chen, S., Yan, H., Wang, C., Wu, C., Haleem, Y. A., Duan, S., Lu, J., Ge, B., et al. (2019) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0402-6 · Cited by 1,166
Lu, B., Guo, L., Wu, F., Peng, Y., Lu, J. E., Smart, T. J., Wang, N., Finfrock, Y. Z., Morris, D., Zhang, P., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08419-3 · Cited by 629
Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Dinh, C.-T., Li, J., Ozden, A., Golam Kibria, M., Seifitokaldani, A., Tan, C.-S., Gabardo, C. M., Luo, M., et al. (2019) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-019-0397-1 · Cited by 561
Xiao, H., Shin, H., & Goddard, W. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1722034115 · Cited by 555
Self-citationXiao, H., Cheng, T., Goddard, W. A., & Sundararaman, R. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b11390 · Cited by 527
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sundararaman, R., & Goddard, W. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2015-02-11
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 064107-064107
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2006762137
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The charge-asymmetric nonlocally determined local-electric (CANDLE) solvation model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.4907731
- The paper
- Sundararaman, R., & Goddard, W. A. (2015). The charge-asymmetric nonlocally determined local-electric (CANDLE) solvation model. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4907731
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.