Cited by 32Terahertz technology and applicationsSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications

A decade-spanning high-resolution asynchronous optical sampling terahertz time-domain and frequency comb spectrometer

Good, Jacob T., Holland, Daniel B., Finneran, Ian A., Carroll, P. Brandon, Kelley, Matthew J., Blake, Geoffrey A.·2015·Review of Scientific Instruments

Abstract

We present the design and capabilities of a high-resolution, decade-spanning ASynchronous OPtical Sampling (ASOPS)-based TeraHertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy (THz-TDS) instrument. Our system employs dual mode-locked femtosecond Ti:Sapphire oscillators with repetition rates offset locked at 100 Hz via a Phase-Locked Loop (PLL) operating at the 60th harmonic of the ∼80 MHz oscillator repetition rates. The respective time delays of the individual laser pulses are scanned across a 12.5 ns window in a laboratory scan time of 10 ms, supporting a time delay resolution as fine as 15.6 fs. The repetition rate of the pump oscillator is synchronized to a Rb frequency standard via a PLL operating at the 12th harmonic of the oscillator repetition rate, achieving milliHertz (mHz) stability. We characterize the timing jitter of the system using an air-spaced etalon, an optical cross correlator, and the phase noise spectrum of the PLL. Spectroscopic applications of ASOPS-THz-TDS are demonstrated by measuring water vapor absorption lines from 0.55 to 3.35 THz and acetonitrile absorption lines from 0.13 to 1.39 THz in a short pathlength gas cell. With 70 min of data acquisition, a 50 dB signal-to-noise ratio is achieved. The achieved root-mean-square deviation is 14.6 MHz, with a mean deviation of 11.6 MHz, for the measured water line center frequencies as compared to the JPL molecular spectroscopy database. Further, with the same instrument and data acquisition hardware, we use the ability to c…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4932567

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Good, J. T., Holland, D. B., Finneran, I. A., Carroll, P. B., Kelley, M. J., & Blake, G. A.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Review of Scientific Instruments
Published
2015-10-01
Volume
86
Issue
10
Pages
103107-103107
ISSN
  • 0034-6748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7623
OpenAlex
W1958169147
Cited by
32
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Review of Scientific Instruments (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (CHE-0722330, CHE-1214123)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Terahertz technology and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Keywords
asynchronous optical sampling, terahertz time-domain spectroscopy, femtosecond mode-locked laser, phase-locked loop, repetition rate stabilization, timing jitter, water vapor absorption lines, Doppler-limited resolution, high-resolution spectroscopy, gas-phase spectroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review