The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perspective: How good is DFT for water?
Open accessAbstract
Kohn-Sham density functional theory (DFT) has become established as an indispensable tool for investigating aqueous systems of all kinds, including those important in chemistry, surface science, biology, and the earth sciences. Nevertheless, many widely used approximations for the exchange-correlation (XC) functional describe the properties of pure water systems with an accuracy that is not fully satisfactory. The explicit inclusion of dispersion interactions generally improves the description, but there remain large disagreements between the predictions of different dispersion-inclusive methods. We present here a review of DFT work on water clusters, ice structures, and liquid water, with the aim of elucidating how the strengths and weaknesses of different XC approximations manifest themselves across this variety of water systems. Our review highlights the crucial role of dispersion in describing the delicate balance between compact and extended structures of many different water systems, including the liquid. By referring to a wide range of published work, we argue that the correct description of exchange-overlap interactions is also extremely important, so that the choice of semi-local or hybrid functional employed in dispersion-inclusive methods is crucial. The origins and consequences of beyond-2-body errors of approximate XC functionals are noted, and we also discuss the substantial differences between different representations of dispersion. We propose a simple numerical scoring system that rates the performance of different XC functionals in describing water systems, and we suggest possible future developments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Tkatchenko, A., & Scheffler, M. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.073005 · Cited by 6,286
Gaussian Approximation Potentials: The Accuracy of Quantum Mechanics, without the Electrons
Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R., & Csányi, G. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.136403 · Cited by 3,242
Molecular Electronic‐Structure Theory
Helgaker, T., Jørgensen, P., & Olsen, J. (2000) · doi:10.1002/9781119019572 · Cited by 2,594
Proton Transfer 200 Years after von Grotthuss: Insights from Ab Initio Simulations
Marx, D. (2006) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.200600128 · Cited by 920
Cited by
Electrocatalysis in Alkaline Media and Alkaline Membrane-Based Energy Technologies
Yang, Y., Peltier, C. R., Zeng, R., Schimmenti, R., Li, Q., Huang, X., Yan, Z., Potsi, G., Selhorst, R., Lu, X., et al. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00331 · Cited by 544
Chen, M., Zheng, L., Santra, B., Ko, H.-Y., DiStasio Jr, R. A., Klein, M. L., Car, R., & Wu, X. (2018) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41557-018-0010-2 · Cited by 283
Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods
Martin, R. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108555586 · Cited by 269
Confinement effects and acid strength in zeolites
Grifoni, E., Piccini, G., Lercher, J. A., Glezakou, V.-A., Rousseau, R., & Parrinello, M. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22936-0 · Cited by 203
Schauble, E. A., & Young, E. D. (2021) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2138/rmg.2021.86.04 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Gillan, M. J., Alfè, D., & Michaelides, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2016-04-01
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 130901-130901
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2299046272
- Cited by
- 743
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 38.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perspective: How good is DFT for water? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.4944633
- The paper
- Gillan, M. J., Alfè, D., & Michaelides, A. (2016). Perspective: How good is DFT for water? The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4944633
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.