Cited by 137Technology-Enhanced Education StudiesOnline and Blended LearningOnline Learning and Analytics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Google classroom as a tool for active learning

Abstract

As the world is being developed with the new technologies, discovering and manipulating new ideas and concepts of online education are changing rapidly. In response to these changes, many states, institutions, and organizations have been working on strategic plans to implement online education. At the same time, misconceptions and myths related to the difficulty of teaching and learning online, technologies available to support online instruction, the support and compensation needed for high-quality instructors, and the needs of online students create challenges for such vision statements and planning documents. This paper provides analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of Google Classroom’s active learning activities for data mining subject under the Decision Sciences program. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has been employed to measure the effectiveness of the learning activities. A total of 100 valid unduplicated responses from students who enrolled data mining subject were used in this study. The results indicated that majority of the students satisfy with the Google Classroom’s tool that were introduced in the class. Results of data analyzed showed that all ratios are above averages. In particular, comparative performance is good in the areas of ease of access, perceived usefulness, communication and interaction, instruction delivery and students’ satisfaction towards the Google Classroom’s active learning activities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.4960909

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Rodzi, S. S. M.
Affiliations
Universiti Utara Malaysia (MY)
Venue
AIP Conference Proceedings
Publisher
Author(s)
Published
2016
Volume
1761
Pages
020069
ISSN
0094-243X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2511325517
Cited by
137
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
FWCI
26.54
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AIP conference proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • Universiti Utara Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Utara Malaysia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
Google Classroom, active learning, online learning, data mining education, technology acceptance model, student satisfaction, perceived usefulness, ease of use, online learning tools, instructor support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review