Long-term settlement prediction at open dumping area using Hossein and Gabr method for new development
Abstract
In Malaysia, the most common method of disposal is landfill/open dumping. The soil at the dumping area are mixed with waste and soil. Thus, it was called as waste soil. Due to its heterogeneity properties, waste soil has a different settlement rate because different types of waste tends to settle differently. The Hussein and Gabr model which used empirical model was proposed to compute the long-term settlement. This Hussein and Gabr model is one of the soil settlement model that can be used to predict the long-term settlement at the dumping area. The model relates between the compression index and the time factor. The time factor are t1, t2, t3 and t4. The compression index is Cα1=compression index and Cβ is biodegradation index. The duration for initial compression, the compression, the biological compression and time creep are included in the model. The sample of waste soil is taken from closed dumping area in Lukut, Negeri Sembilan with the height of waste approximately 1 to 3 meters. The sample is tested using consolidation test for determining the geotechnical parameters and compressibility index. Based on the Hossein and Gabr model, the predicted long-term settlement for 20 years (ΔH) for the waste height of 1 to 3 meters are 0.21m, 0.42m and 0.63m respectively and are below the percentages of proposed maximum settlement for waste soil which is acceptable for new development to takes place.. The types of deep or shallow foundation are proposed based on the predicted settlement. The abandoned open dumping area can now be reused for the new development after the long-term settlement are predicted and some of the precaution measures has been taken as a safety measures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Spanish version of the MAAS has high temporal stability (r = 0.823).
“The Spanish version has good internal consistency (Cohen’s alpha = 0.89) and high temporal stability (r = 0.823), with low sensitivity to change after mindfulness trainings (r = 0.79) [57].”
The Spanish version of the MAAS has low sensitivity to change after mindfulness trainings (r = 0.79).
“The Spanish version has good internal consistency (Cohen’s alpha = 0.89) and high temporal stability (r = 0.823), with low sensitivity to change after mindfulness trainings (r = 0.79) [57].”
The Spanish version of the Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS) has good internal consistency (Cohen's alpha = 0.89).
“The Spanish version has good internal consistency (Cohen’s alpha = 0.89) and high temporal stability (r = 0.823), with low sensitivity to change after mindfulness trainings (r = 0.79) [57].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 3
- Authors
- Pauzi, N. I. M., Shariffuddin, A. S., Omar, H., & Misran, H.
- Affiliations
- Universiti Tenaga Nasional (MY)
- Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
- Venue
- AIP Conference Proceedings
- Publisher
- Author(s)
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 1865
- Pages
- 090009
- ISSN
- 0094-243X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2737125960
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.78
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AIP conference proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
- Keywords
- long-term settlement prediction, open dumping, waste soil, compression index, consolidation, landfill settlement, foundation design, land reuse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
