The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural networks vs Gaussian process regression for representing potential energy surfaces: A comparative study of fit quality and vibrational spectrum accuracy
Abstract
For molecules with more than three atoms, it is difficult to fit or interpolate a potential energy surface (PES) from a small number of (usually ab initio) energies at points. Many methods have been proposed in recent decades, each claiming a set of advantages. Unfortunately, there are few comparative studies. In this paper, we compare neural networks (NNs) with Gaussian process (GP) regression. We re-fit an accurate PES of formaldehyde and compare PES errors on the entire point set used to solve the vibrational Schrödinger equation, i.e., the only error that matters in quantum dynamics calculations. We also compare the vibrational spectra computed on the underlying reference PES and the NN and GP potential surfaces. The NN and GP surfaces are constructed with exactly the same points, and the corresponding spectra are computed with the same points and the same basis. The GP fitting error is lower, and the GP spectrum is more accurate. The best NN fits to 625/1250/2500 symmetry unique potential energy points have global PES root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 6.53/2.54/0.86 cm−1, whereas the best GP surfaces have RMSE values of 3.87/1.13/0.62 cm−1, respectively. When fitting 625 symmetry unique points, the error in the first 100 vibrational levels is only 0.06 cm−1 with the best GP fit, whereas the spectrum on the best NN PES has an error of 0.22 cm−1, with respect to the spectrum computed on the reference PES. This error is reduced to about 0.01 cm−1 when fitting 2500 points with either the NN or GP. We also find that the GP surface produces a relatively accurate spectrum when obtained based on as few as 313 points.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 · Cited by 21,728
Gaussian Approximation Potentials: The Accuracy of Quantum Mechanics, without the Electrons
Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R., & Csányi, G. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.136403 · Cited by 3,242
On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals
Sobol', I. M. (1967) · USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1016/0041-5553(67)90144-9 · Cited by 2,975
Cited by
Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science
Schmidt, J., Marques, M. R. G., Botti, S., & Marques, M. A. L. (2019) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-019-0221-0 · Cited by 2,607
Unke, O. T., Chmiela, S., Sauceda, H. E., Gastegger, M., Poltavsky, I., Schütt, K. T., Tkatchenko, A., & Müller, K.-R. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01111 · Cited by 1,647
Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials
Drautz, R. (2019) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.99.014104 · Cited by 959
Physics-Inspired Structural Representations for Molecules and Materials
Musil, F., Grisafi, A., Bartók, A. P., Ortner, C., Csányi, G., & Ceriotti, M. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00021 · Cited by 523
Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Machine Learning
Dral, P. O. (2020) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03664 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Kamath, A., Vargas-Hernández, R. A., Krems, R. V., Carrington, T., & Manzhos, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2018-03-15
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 241702-241702
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2792351009
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural networks vs Gaussian process regression for representing potential energy surfaces: A comparative study of fit quality and vibrational spectrum accuracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.5003074
- The paper
- Kamath, A., Vargas-Hernández, R. A., Krems, R. V., Carrington, T., & Manzhos, S. (2018). Neural networks vs Gaussian process regression for representing potential energy surfaces: A comparative study of fit quality and vibrational spectrum accuracy. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5003074
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.