Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4E-Government and Public ServicesTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourPublic Procurement and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Information sharing model in supporting implementation of e-procurement service: Case of Bandung city

Ramantoko, Gadang, Irawan, Herry·2017·AIP Conference Proceedings

Abstract

This research examines the factors influencing the Information Sharing Model in Supporting Implementation of e-Procurement Services: Case of Bandung City in its early maturity stage. The early maturity of information sharing stage was determined using e-Government Maturity Stage Conceptual Framework from Estevez. Bandung City e-Procurement Information Sharing system was categorized at stage 1 in Estevez’ model where the concern was mainly on assessing the benefit and risk of implementing the system. The Authors were using DeLone & McLean (D&M) Information System Success model to study benefit and risk of implementing the system in Bandung city. The model was then empirically tested by employing survey data that was collected from the available 40 listed supplier firms. D&M’s model adjusted by Klischewski’s description was introducing Information Quality, System Quality, and Service Quality as independent variable; Usability and User Satisfaction as intermediate dependent variable; and Perceived Net Benefit as final dependent variable. The findings suggested that, all of the predictors in D&M’s model significantly influenced the net perceived benefit of implementing the e-Procurement system in the early maturity stage. The theoretical contribution of this research suggested that D&M’s model might find useful in modeling complex information technology successfulness such as the one used in e-Procurement service. This research could also have implications for policy makers (LPSE…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.5005450

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · DOI · Paper page
  3. R. Halonen, T. Acton, W. Golden, K. Conboy, DeLone & McLean Success Model as a Descriptive Tool in Evaluating the Use of a Virtual Learning Environment, International Conference on Organizational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (2009).
  4. P.J.H. Hu, Evaluating Telemedicine Systems Success: a Revised Model, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE (2003). · DOI
  5. W.H. DeLone, E.R. McLean, Measuring e-Commerce Success: Applying the DeLone & McLean Information Systems Success Model, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1) 31–47 (2004).
  6. E. Estevez, P. Fillottrani, T. Janowski, Government Information Sharing: a Framework for Policy Formulation, Electronic Governance and Cross-Boundary Collaboration: Innovations and Advancing Tools (2012) pp. 33.
  7. E. Estevez, Government Information Sharing Framework, United Nation University, Macao (2012). · DOI
  8. R. Klischewski and H.J. Scholl, Information Quality as Capstone in Negotiating e-Government Integration, Interoperation and Information Sharing, Electronic Government: An International Journal, 5(2) (2008). L.D. Bacon, Using LISREL and PLS to Measure Customer Satisfaction. InSeventh Annual Sawtooth Software Conference, La Jolla CA (1999), pp. 305–306.
  9. 10.1509/jmkr.47.4.699 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ramantoko, G., & Irawan, H.
Affiliations
Telkom University (ID)
Venue
AIP Conference Proceedings
Publisher
Author(s)
Published
2017
Volume
1891
Pages
020117
ISSN
0094-243X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766098639
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.03
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AIP conference proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
Keywords
e-procurement, information sharing, e-government maturity, DeLone and McLean IS success model, information quality, system quality, service quality, usability, user satisfaction, perceived net benefits, public procurement, Bandung, suppliers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review