Cited by 24Thermal properties of materialsThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesMetal and Thin Film Mechanics

Hafnium nitride films for thermoreflectance transducers at high temperatures: Potential based on heating from laser absorption

Rost, Christina M., Braun, Jeffrey, Ferri, Kevin, Backman, Lavina, Giri, Ashutosh, Opila, Elizabeth J., Maria, Jon-Paul, Hopkins, Patrick E.·2017·Applied Physics Letters

Abstract

Time domain thermoreflectance (TDTR) and frequency domain thermoreflectance (FDTR) are common pump-probe techniques that are used to measure the thermal properties of materials. At elevated temperatures, transducers used in these techniques can become limited by melting or other phase transitions. In this work, time domain thermoreflectance is used to determine the viability of HfN thin film transducers grown on SiO2 through measurements of the SiO2 thermal conductivity up to approximately 1000 K. Further, the reliability of HfN as a transducer is determined by measuring the thermal conductivities of MgO, Al2O3, and diamond at room temperature. The thermoreflectance coefficient of HfN was found to be 1.4 × 10−4 K−1 at 800 nm, one of the highest thermoreflectance coefficients measured at this standard TDTR probe wavelength. Additionally, the high absorption of HfN at 400 nm is shown to enable reliable laser heating to elevate the sample temperature during a measurement, relative to other transducers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.5006648

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers are looking for alternative metal transducers for TDTR measurements at higher temperatures (with Pt and HfN as potential candidates) or attempting to perform TDTR measurements without metal transducers at high temperatures.

    “Researchers are looking for alternative metal transducers for TDTR measurements at higher temperatures (with Pt and HfN 229 as two examples of the potential candidates) or attempting to perform TDTR measurements without metal transducers at high temperatures. 142”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 24

Authors
Rost, C. M., Braun, J., Ferri, K., Backman, L., Giri, A., Opila, E. J., Maria, J.-P., & Hopkins, P. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Published
2017-10-09
Volume
111
Issue
15
ISSN
  • 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
  • 1077-3118
OpenAlex
W2763995872
Cited by
24
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Naval Research Global (N00014-15- 1- 2863)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
Keywords
hafnium nitride, time-domain thermoreflectance, frequency-domain thermoreflectance, thermal conductivity, MgO, alumina, diamond, laser heating, high-temperature measurement, thin films, thermal properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review