Cited by 160Metamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsAdvanced Antenna and Metasurface TechnologiesMachine Learning in Materials Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural network based design of metagratings

Inampudi, Sandeep, Mosallaei, Hossein·2018·Applied Physics Letters

Abstract

Metagratings are flat and thin surfaces that rely on unique, periodically repeating (non-gradient), arbitrary shaped light scattering units for wave manipulation. However, the absence of an empirical relationship between the structural and diffraction properties of the units enforces utilization of brute force numerical optimization techniques to determine the unit shape for a desired application. Here, we present an artificial neural network based methodology to develop a fast-paced numerical relationship between the two. We demonstrate the training and the performance of a numerical function, utilizing simulated diffraction efficiencies of a large set of units, that can instantaneously mimic the optical response of any other arbitrary shaped unit of the same class. We validate the performance of the trained neural network on a previously unseen set of test samples and discuss the statistical significance. We then utilize the virtually instantaneous network operations to inverse design the metagrating unit shapes for a desired diffraction efficiency distribution. The proposed inter-disciplinary combination of advanced information processing techniques with Maxwell's equation solvers opens a pathway for the fast-paced prediction of metagrating designs rather than full wave computation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.5033327

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 2011, Science, 334, 333, 10.1126/science.1210713 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2012, Science, 335, 427, 10.1126/science.1214686 · DOI
  3. 2013, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 30, 2365, 10.1364/JOSAB.30.002365 · DOI
  4. 2016, Rep. Prog. Phys., 79, 076401, 10.1088/0034-4885/79/7/076401 · DOI
  5. 2016, Phys. Rep., 634, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.04.004 · DOI
  6. 2015, Rep. Prog. Phys., 78, 024401, 10.1088/0034-4885/78/2/024401 · DOI
  7. 2017, Optica, 4, 139, 10.1364/OPTICA.4.000139 · DOI
  8. 2017, Adv. Opt. Mater., 5, 1700147, 10.1002/adom.201700147 · DOI
  9. 2016, Phys. Rev. X, 6, 041008, 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.041008 · DOI
  10. 2016, Phys. Rev. B, 94, 075142, 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.075142 · DOI
  11. 2016, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 33, A31, 10.1364/JOSAB.33.000A31 · DOI
  12. 2017, Phys. Rev. Lett., 119, 067404, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.067404 · DOI
  13. 2017, Nano Lett., 17, 3752, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01082 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 2015, Optica, 2, 716, 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000716 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2017, Phys. Rev. Appl., 8, 054037, 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.054037 · DOI
  16. 2018, ACS Photonics, 5, 1779, 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01528 · DOI
  17. 2018, Ann. Phys., 530, 1700302, 10.1002/andp.201700302 · DOI
  18. 2015, Nano Lett., 15, 6709, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02524 · DOI
  19. 2016, Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques
  20. 1998, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation
  21. 2017, Optica, 4, 1437, 10.1364/OPTICA.4.001437 · DOI
  22. 2014, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 62, 7, 10.1109/TAP.2013.2283605 · DOI
  23. 2017, Optica, 4, 1117, 10.1364/OPTICA.4.001117 · DOI
  24. 2018, ACS Photonics, 5, 1365, 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01377 · DOI
  25. 2018, Proc. SPIE, 10526, 1052607, 10.1117/12.2289195 · DOI
  26. I. Malkiel , A.Nagler, M.Mrejen, U.Arieli, L.Wolf, and H.Suchowski, preprint arXiv:1702.07949 (2017). · arXiv
  27. 2005, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method
  28. 1991, Finite Element Analysis
  29. 1995, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 12, 1068, 10.1364/JOSAA.12.001068 · DOI
  30. 2017, Appl. Opt., 56, 3132, 10.1364/AO.56.003132 · DOI
  31. 2018, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 35, 39, 10.1364/JOSAB.35.000039 · DOI
  32. 2017, Sci. Rep., 7, 12228, 10.1038/s41598-017-12541-x · DOI
  33. 2013, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light
  34. 2015, Opt. Express, 23, 2764, 10.1364/OE.23.002764 · DOI
  35. 1989, Neural Networks, 2, 359, 10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 2006, Math. Program., 107, 391, 10.1007/s10107-004-0560-5 · DOI
  37. 2017, Phys. Rev. X, 7, 041056, 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.041056 · DOI
  38. 2016, J. Opt., 18, 125003, 10.1088/2040-8978/18/12/125003 · DOI
  39. 2018, Adv. Opt. Mater., 6, 1701275, 10.1002/adom.201701275 · DOI
  40. 2006, Nano Mechanics and Materials: Theory, Multiscale Methods and Applications

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Inampudi, S., & Mosallaei, H.
Affiliations
Northeastern University (US)
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Published
2018-06-11
Volume
112
Issue
24
ISSN
  • 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
  • 1077-3118
OpenAlex
W2808180483
Cited by
160
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 6
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Physics Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-14-1-0349)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
metagratings, artificial neural networks, inverse design, diffraction efficiency, unit cell geometry, wave manipulation, metasurfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural network based design of metagratings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.5033327
The paper
Inampudi, S., & Mosallaei, H. (2018). Neural network based design of metagratings. Applied Physics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5033327