The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory
Abstract
We seek a quantum-theoretic expression for the probability that an unstable particle prepared initially in a well defined state ρ will be found to decay sometime during a given interval. It is argued that probabilities like this which pertain to continuous monitoring possess operational meaning. A simple natural approach to this problem leads to the conclusion that an unstable particle which is continuously observed to see whether it decays will never be found to decay!. Since recording the track of an unstable particle (which can be distinguished from its decay products) approximately realizes such continuous observations, the above conclusion seems to pose a paradox which we call Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory. The relation of this result to that of some previous works and its implications and possible resolutions are briefly discussed. The mathematical transcription of the above-mentioned conclusion is a structure theorem concerning semigroups. Although special cases of this theorem are known, the general formulation and the proof given here are believed to be new. We also note that the known ’’no-go’’ theorem concerning the semigroup law for the reduced evolution of any physical system (including decaying systems) is subsumed under our theorem as a direct corollary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Die gegenw�rtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik
Schr�dinger, E. (1935) · Die Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf01491891 · Cited by 3,392
Cited by
The quantum-jump approach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics
Plenio, M. B., & Knight, P. L. (1998) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.70.101 · Cited by 1,515
The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment
Joos, E., & Zeh, H. D. (1985) · Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter · doi:10.1007/bf01725541 · Cited by 1,505
Environment-induced superselection rules
Zurek, W. H. (1982) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.26.1862 · Cited by 1,415
Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: Into what mixture does the wave packet collapse?
Zurek, W. H. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.24.1516 · Cited by 1,257
Quantum trajectories and open many-body quantum systems
Daley, A. J. (2014) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018732.2014.933502 · Cited by 853
Metadata
- Authors
- Misra, B., & Sudarshan, E. C. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Mathematical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1977-04-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 756-763
- ISSN
- 0022-2488 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7658
- OpenAlex
- W2013879218
- Cited by
- 2,272
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.523304
- The paper
- Misra, B., & Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1977). The Zeno’s paradox in quantum theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.523304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.