The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems. II. Extensions to additional classes of responses
Abstract
This work extends a recent, functional-analytic formulation of sensitivity theory to include treatment of additional types of responses. There are physical systems where a critical point of a function that depends on the system’s state vector and parameters defines the location in phase-space where the response functional is evaluated. The Gâteaux differentials giving the sensitivities of both the functional and the critical point to changes in the system’s parameters are obtained by alternative formalisms. The foward sensitivity formalism is the simpler and more general, but may be prohibitively expensive for problems with large data bases. The adjoint sensitivity formalism, although less generally applicable and requiring several adjoint calculations, is likely to be the only practical approach. Sensitivity theory is also extended to include treatment of general operators, acting on the system’s state vector and parameters, as response. In this case, the forward sensitivity formalism is the same as for functional responses, but the adjoint sensitivity formalism is considerably different. The adjoint sensitivity formalism requires expanding the indirect effect term, an element of a Hilbert space, in terms of elements of an orthonormal basis. Since as many calculations of adjoint functions are required as there are nonzero terms in this expansion, careful consideration of truncating the expansion is needed to assess the advantages of the adjoint sensitivity formalism over the forward sensitivity formalism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems
Helton, J. C., & Davis, F. J. (2003) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(03)00058-9 · Cited by 2,688
A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., & Chan, K. P.-S. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485594 · Cited by 2,275
An Investigation of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer Models
Iman, R. L., & Helton, J. C. (1988) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01155.x · Cited by 608
Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems. Tools and applications
Tur�nyi, T. (1990) · Journal of Mathematical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/bf01166355 · Cited by 572
About the use of rank transformation in sensitivity analysis of model output
Saltelli, A., & Sobol', I. M. (1995) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/0951-8320(95)00099-2 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Cacuci, D. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Mathematical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1981-12-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2803-2812
- ISSN
- 0022-2488 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7658
- OpenAlex
- W2008181043
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems. II. Extensions to additional classes of responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.524870
- The paper
- Cacuci, D. G. (1981). Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems. II. Extensions to additional classes of responses. Journal of Mathematical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.524870
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.