Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 41

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Orthogonal transitivity, invertibility, and null geodesic separability in type D electrovac solutions of Einstein’s field equations with cosmological constant

Debever, R., McLenaghan, R. G.·1981·Journal of Mathematical Physics

Abstract

It is shown without explicit integration that all Petrov type D electrovac solutions with cosmological constant for an aligned, nonsingular electromagnetic field which satisfy the generalized Goldberg–Sachs theorem, admit at least a two-parameter, abelian, orthogonally transitive group of local isometries. In the case when the group orbits are non-null the group is invertible, and a symmetric null tetrad is shown to exist in which the principle null congruences defined by the type D Weyl tensor are indistinguishable. An explicit example is given of a solution with null group orbits which contains as a subcase a Kinnersley vacuum solution (with the same property). It is also demonstrated that the Hamilton–Jacobi equation for the null geodesics is always solvable by separation of variables in these solutions, a fact which explains the existence of a conformal Killing tensor therein, and which gives rise to a coordinate system in which the field equations may be integrated in terms of polynomial functions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.525116

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 1969, J. Math. Phys., 10, 1195, 10.1063/1.1664958 · DOI
  2. 1973, Commun. Math. Phys., 33, 129, 10.1007/BF01645624 · DOI
  3. 1971, Bull. Soc. Math. Belg., XXIII, 360
  4. 1975, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 90, 196, 10.1016/0003-4916(75)90145-1 · DOI
  5. 1976, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 98, 9
  6. 1977, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 355, 31, 10.1098/rspa.1977.0085 · DOI
  7. 1969, J. Math. Phys., 10, 70, 10.1063/1.1664763 · DOI
  8. 1968, Commun. Math. Phys., 10, 280, 10.1007/BF03399503 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 1969, Bull. Cl. Sci. Acad. R. Belg., LV, 8
  10. 1972, Util. Math., 2, 55
  11. 1968, Phys. Rev., 174, 1559, 10.1103/PhysRev.174.1559 · DOI
  12. 1970, Commun. Math. Phys., 18, 265, 10.1007/BF01649445 · DOI
  13. 1963, Phys. Rev. Lett., 11, 237, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.237 · DOI
  14. 1972, Commun. Math. Phys., 27, 303, 10.1007/BF01645517 · DOI
  15. 1973, Commun. Math. Phys., 32, 147, 10.1007/BF01645652 · DOI
  16. 1975, Commun. Math. Phys., 44, 9, 10.1007/BF01609055 · DOI
  17. 1980, Bull. Cl. Sci. Acad. R. Belg., LXVI, 204
  18. 1962, J. Math. Phys., 4, 484
  19. 1962, C. R. Acad. Sci. (Paris), 254, 4257
  20. 1979, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 10, 79, 10.1007/BF00757025 · DOI
  21. 1979, Gen. Relativ. Gravit., 10, 853, 10.1007/BF00756664 · DOI
  22. 1976, Bull. Cl. Sci. Acad. R. Belg., LXII, 662
  23. 1964, Cah. Phys., 168–169, 303
  24. 1967, J. Math. Mech., 16, 761
  25. 1978, Bull. Cl. Sci. Acad. R. Belg., LXIV, 130
  26. 1979, Commun. Math. Phys., 70, 69, 10.1007/BF01220503 · DOI
  27. 1966, Z. Phys., 192, 419, 10.1007/BF01325677 · DOI

Cited by

See all 41

Metadata

Authors
Debever, R., & McLenaghan, R. G.
Venue
Journal of Mathematical Physics
Published
1981-08-01
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
1711-1726
ISSN
  • 0022-2488
  • 1089-7658
Cited by
41
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Orthogonal transitivity, invertibility, and null geodesic separability in type D electrovac solutions of Einstein’s field equations with cosmological constant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.525116
The paper
Debever, R., & McLenaghan, R. G. (1981). Orthogonal transitivity, invertibility, and null geodesic separability in type D electrovac solutions of Einstein’s field equations with cosmological constant. Journal of Mathematical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.525116

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.